Apple Reports Record-Breaking Q3 2025 Results

Originally published at: Apple Reports Record-Breaking Q3 2025 Results - TidBITS

Reporting on its Q3 2025 financial results, Apple announced profits of $23.4 billion ($1.57 per diluted share, representing a 12% year-over-year increase) on revenues of $94.0 billion. The company’s revenues rose 10% compared to the year-ago quarter (see “Apple’s Q3 2024 Record Revenues Surprise Tim Cook,” 2 August 2024) and set a new Q3 record.

iPhone, Mac, and Services revenues saw double-digit year-over-year growth, but iPad and Wearables revenues fell slightly. Growth in Services continues to make it an ever-larger share of Apple’s overall revenue model, up to 29% of the total. The Mac rebounded slightly to account for 9% of the total but hasn’t regained the double-digit share it often enjoyed before 2021. The iPhone remains Apple’s cash cow, accounting for 47% of the company’s earnings. The iPad’s portion of Apple’s earnings continues to drop, as does Wearables, which had been growing through 2021.

Q3 2025 Segment percentages

iPhone

After three years of fairly flat sales following a massive jump in 2021, iPhone revenues enjoyed a 13% increase from the year-ago quarter, bringing in $44.6 billion. Apple repeatedly emphasized that the growth was largely due to the strength of the iPhone 16 lineup in comparison to the iPhone 15 lineup, explicitly calling out the iPhone 16e.

However, Tim Cook also acknowledged that consumer uncertainty around the Trump administration’s tariff threats was responsible for about 1% of Apple’s 10% overall revenue growth for the quarter. In other words, when the administration was threatening to slap unprecedented tariffs on goods manufactured overseas, particularly in China, many people bought iPhones in April in anticipation of Apple raising prices. In response, Apple moved the manufacturing for the majority (71%) of iPhones sold in the US to India, with most other US-destined products being manufactured in Vietnam. The vast majority of products destined for other countries remain manufactured in China.

Additionally, regional governments in China have launched subsidies for consumer electronics to spur consumer spending. Apple’s participation in those promotions helped the iPhone to take the top three sales spots in urban China.

Another interesting data point: Apple said that it has now shipped over three billion iPhones since the product’s introduction in 2007. That’s a lot of iPhones.

Q3 2025 iPhone revenue

Mac

Thanks to strong demand for the M4 MacBook Air, revenues in the Mac segment rose an impressive 15% from last year’s third quarter to $8 billion, just below 2021’s record of $8.2 billion. The 2021 record came in part from pandemic-driven demand, but also with the first year of Macs with Apple silicon. Although it might seem as though most people would have upgraded from Intel-based Macs by now, Cook emphasized that Apple set a June quarter record for Mac upgraders thanks to the strength of Apple silicon. It wasn’t just sales to consumers either; Apple CFO Kevan Parekh said, “We had the best June quarter ever for Mac at enterprise.”

Q3 2025 Mac revenue

iPad

iPad revenues declined 8% compared to last year’s third quarter results, achieving $6.6 billion in revenues. Apple attributed the drop to no new models being introduced during the quarter as compared to last year’s introduction of M2 iPad Air and M4 iPad Pro—one of the company’s “difficult compares.” This rings hollow given Apple’s March 2025 release of the M3 iPad Air, which was credited with improving iPad revenues last quarter (see “Apple Q2 2025 Financials Solid Despite Upcoming Tariff Uncertainty,” 2 May 2025). Apparently, the M3 iPad Air didn’t continue to generate sales the way that the M4 MacBook Air did, even though both came out in March 2025.

When given the opportunity during the earnings call’s Q&A period, Tim Cook notably chose not to comment on iPad revenues; he did, however, point out the Mac-like changes coming to the iPad in the forthcoming iPadOS 26. Based on reports from beta testers, the iPadOS 26 multitasking changes will significantly boost the iPad’s capabilities and could drive more sales.

Q3 2025 iPad revenue

Wearables, Home, and Accessories

The Wearables segment, like the iPad results, reported a year-over-year revenue decline, tallying $7.4 billion in revenues, a 9% drop. Kevan Parekh attributed some of the decrease to another “difficult compare” against last year’s third quarter, which saw the release of the Apple Vision Pro and accessory sales (like the Apple Pencil and Magic Keyboard) associated with the release of the M2 iPad Air and M4 iPad Pro. However, Apple also set a quarterly record for Apple Watch upgraders, and the Apple Watch installed user base reached an all-time high.

While Vision Pro revenues are likely a drop in the bucket and don’t seem likely to improve much, Apple seemed to be emphasizing the enterprise uses of the Vision Pro more than one might expect from the company’s consumer-focused marketing. In particular, Cook called out CAE’s use of the Vision Pro to help pilots become more familiar with aircraft procedures.

Q3 2025 Wearables revenue

Services

Over the last decade, the Services revenue graph has never faltered in its relentless climb. For this year’s third quarter, Services brought in $27.4 billion, representing a 13% increase from the same quarter last year. As always, the Services revenue benefits from the ever-increasing number of Apple users—Tim Cook said that the iPhone and Mac installed bases again hit all-time highs during the quarter. The App Store came in for its share of glory, setting a June quarter revenue record. Kevan Parekh also noted that the growth in the number of iCloud paying accounts helped drive an all-time revenue record in cloud services. Furthermore, though the boost in prestige may not result in direct revenue increases, Cook was delighted to report that Apple TV+ productions received a record 81 Emmy nominations.

Q3 2025 Services revenue

Regional

Revenues grew in all geographic segments, led by a 20% increase from the year-ago quarter in Asia Pacific, a 13% increase in Japan, a 10% increase in Europe, and a 9% increase in the Americas. The smallest increase came from China, at 4%, which was still a nice rebound from the decline Apple posted last quarter. Apple attributed the rise in China to government subsidies that helped iPhone sales and strong Mac performance, which made the MacBook Air the top-selling laptop and the Mac mini the top-selling desktop in China.

Q3 2025 Regional revenue

Tariffs and AI

Uncertainty over tariffs continues to cloud Apple’s financial future. For this quarter, Apple actually benefited slightly from the tariffs. Cook said that 1% of Apple’s 10% revenue growth came from “pull-forward” sales—people buying in anticipation of higher prices due to tariffs. Since Apple’s Q3 2024 revenues were $85.8 billion, Q3 2025’s $94.0 billion represented an increase of $8.2 billion. 1% of that is $820 million. In contrast, Cook said that tariffs in this quarter cost Apple approximately $800 million, slightly less than Apple’s tariff revenue.

However, in wording that was carefully crafted to avoid arousing political ire, Cook said, “For the September quarter, assuming the current global tariff rates, policies, and applications do not change for the balance of the quarter, and no new tariffs are added, we estimate the impact to add about $1.1 billion.” Then the Trump administration imposed a 25% tariff on products made in India and 20% on products made in Vietnam. However, smartphones, computers, and various electronic parts have been exempt since April 2025. Cook did take pains to mention Apple’s plans to invest $500 billion in US manufacturing, which already provides some chips, glass for the iPhone, and the Face ID module.

Also, while pundits and users alike repeatedly decry Apple’s inability to deliver useful AI features (see “Do You Use It? Apple Intelligence Sees Weak Adoption,” 20 June 2025), Cook was optimistic about Apple’s AI future, calling AI “one of the most profound technologies of our lifetime” and stating that Apple was “significantly growing” its investment in AI technology. That includes large capital expenditures (“capex” in analyst speak) for building additional Private Cloud Compute datacenters and investing in third-party capacity. That Apple chose to emphasize these AI investments to analysts shows that the company is well aware that it can’t afford to be seen as being left behind in the AI race, however true that seems to be at the moment.

Apple faces two major challenges in the coming year: navigating an arbitrarily complex international trade landscape and delivering on its AI promises before customer patience runs thin. The company has shown impressive agility in shifting production between countries to minimize tariff impacts, but the capriciousness of US tariff policy could force Apple either to raise prices or accept lower profits. Meanwhile, Apple’s significant AI investments suggest the company knows it needs to ship compelling features that match or exceed its competitors’ offerings.

We could ask Siri how that’s going, but she’d probably just defer to ChatGPT.

4 Likes

FWIW, I have been very pleasantly surprised by the quality and quantity of original programming on ATV+. I’m watching a lot more on that service than I ever did on Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, Paramount+ or HBO Max.

If others share my opinion, that will definitely translate into better market share and hopefully higher revenue as well.

4 Likes

I share your opinion, and so do some of my family members. In addition to that I think the way Family Sharing works with Apple, not being limited to members of the same household, makes sharing the cost of a subscription easy, contributing to subscribing to a service you might not subscribe to if you had to bear the costs alone.

I find it interesting that very recently, under oath, Apple executives said they had no idea how much money they make from the App Store. And now they say it’s had a record quarter for revenue. Am I reading this right?

Also interesting to note they are “finally” giving people what they want with the iPad the year the sales start really slumping and new hardware not moving the needle.

Those graphs are incredible but I worry about the corrupting influence of becoming a “Services” company, which these days is uncomfortably close to an “advertising” company. Even doing it in the Apple style of keeping everything “in-ecosystem,” I’ve seen a disturbing trend towards pushing their own products with their own products, literally pushing notifications in some cases.

I do think that Apple Music and TV+ and their other services are generally of high quality. But I worry about service creep with things like Apple One. Remember how good Prime was when it first came out? Now it’s ten times the price with a thousand services no one uses and is grudgingly accepted by many. I don’t want to see Apple go that way.

3 Likes

I sense the same discomfort here.

I want Apple to make great computer hardware (plus some peripherals) and equip it with a great OS, perhaps a couple of apps too. That’s it.

“Services” and service revenue are a distraction from that. They allow Apple to get away with lackluster engineering and instead pad their revenue sheets with easy profit from media and cloud gouging. I would also claim that the more Apple talks about services and service revenue, the less focused they are on their users, use cases, and user demand, while they become more and more enthralled with stock price, market valuation, and appeasing the financial industry.

I personally try to do whatever I can to subvert that trend. I refuse to subscribe to Apple services ($1/month toward extra iCloud storage at the begging of my wife being the exception). I have never subscribed to Apple Music and I will never pay a single Dollar for any Apple TV+ subscription and even less so for any type of “Apple News” being shoved down my throat. I try to rent my movies elsewhere (which is surprisingly easy considering Apple often doesn’t even offer the flic I want). And I will not purchase any AppleCare insurance. I will not watch any sports through Apple, nor will I consider getting apps in the App Store that I can instead get from the dev directly. I will for sure never buy any games from Apple or play them through Apple Arcade. Certainly, that is all just a drop in the ocean, but if enough people refuse to buy “services” from Apple and instead buy Macs from them only when they actually innovate and push the envelope, perhaps then the suits at Apple will finally be reminded of why the world even knows that Apple is not just a fruit. I don’t need another Google, Microsoft, or Netflix. I just want a great Mac.

3 Likes

LOL. That train left the station/that ship sailed/that flight took off on December 12, 1980. Plus for all of Jobs’ countercultural beliefs, he was always focused on revenues, profits, and status symbols. If anybody, it was Woz who valued the voice of the user over the the voice of the trader.

2 Likes

When you list it out like that it really is a lot. I would be ok with paying iCloud if they would just give it some attention. I’ve bought some movies and shows through Apple, but I have to watch them through what’s become the TV app which has a lot of ads all over now where it used to have zero.

Those are some of the corrupting influences I’m thinking of, taking things they have and purposely neglecting them or making them worse to extract more money from them.

That is a good point. For a literal dirty barefoot hippy, he sure knew a lot about financials…

Blockquote
I personally try to do whatever I can to subvert that trend. I refuse to subscribe to Apple services ($1/month toward extra iCloud storage at the begging of my wife being the exception).

Big agreement here with Simon, who is perhaps is even more dedicated against Apple Services, than I am.

1 - Apple does not need my additional money for Services. (Although my wife and I do have some AppleCare coverage for some of our Apple devices.)

2 - Although not strictly related to “Services”, the Apple apps developers do not provide good support (IMHO). As a result, I try to go with smaller third-party vendors (for example, these apps: BusyCal, 1Password, Mimestream, etc.) whenever possible, largely because they do care about software quality and are responsive to customers.

3 - I also “just want a great Mac”.

Yes, because the executives took advantage of the difference between the definitions of revenue and profit and of the acceptance of regulators and investors of a decrease in financial reporting transparency. It’s worth noting that the judge overseeing the trial you mentioned decided the executives committed perjury.

The key points here are:

  • Apple’s testimony claimed it has no way of determining the App Store’s profits (profit = revenue - costs) because of its corporate structure and accounting practices.
  • Apple—and many other tech companies, including Amazon—are not required to report highly detailed breakdowns of specific products and lines of business in their quarterly and annual financial releases anymore. In the past, companies did provide more detail but sometimes only to professional investors in private settings or on different dates for different audiences. To curtail this preferential treatment, regulators now require companies to release identical data to analysts, journalists, and the public simultaneously. Companies responded to the increased scrutiny by drastically reducing the granularity of their reporting.
  • Apple’s most recent earnings media conference and press release did indeed brag about record App Store revenues. But there was no mention of profits or profitability. This fits into the courtroom narrative offered up by Apple but, as the judge also thinks, there is no way that a multi-national, tightly managed company with many billions of dollars in annual sales doesn’t know the financial performance of one of its core businesses.
2 Likes

They will have some estimates for Apple internal use, but what they wont have is audited numbers. Apple will have contracts for servers, but wouldn’t be looking too closely at what proportion should be allocated to each division. How do you divide up the money that Apple spends each year on OS development, seeing it is divided up between iOS, iPadOS and MacOS and they probably consider that some of the fees generated by the App Store are actually reimbursement for use of Apples’s API. Now that they make content, that also is a bit of a pain, as it is for future revenue.

1 Like

Yes. I’d just add that audited and GAAP-compliant reports don’t have to be used internally (for anybody interested, there is a whole branch of accounting devoted to numbers for internal use, cost accounting).

1 Like

Thank you for the detailed reply. Basically what I was thinking but not nearly as detailed and well written. If they decided they wanted to know how profitable the App Store was they could very easily and quickly know, if in fact they don’t know already.

Re: “growth was largely due to the strength of the iPhone 16”—I feel ticked that Apple suckered me with their hype about Apple Intelligence and their amazing upgrade to Siri’s AI capabilities; and screen sharing, blah, blah, blah.

Having never bought a smartphone before, I was impressed by the iPhone 12’s camera hardware & software and was mildly curious about the iPhone’s possible utility for my particular situation.

I don’t regret (maybe a bit) having an iPhone 16 Pro but I would not have bought it if they had been more truthful about what I would get from their device and software—I’m 73 y.o. and I practically live on my MacBook Pro.

Also, I have collected almost all the “Take Control of” PDFs, now including the iPhone “books” (and thank you, Adam & Tonya for your past TCO PDFs :slightly_smiling_face:).

Ron Gillmore,
VFMS Newsletter editor & web guy