Tim Cook Calls for GDPR-Like Laws around the World


(Josh Centers) #1

Originally published at: https://tidbits.com/2018/10/25/tim-cook-calls-for-gdpr-like-laws-around-the-world/

During a speech in Brussels, Apple CEO Tim Cook reiterated Apple’s strong privacy stance and advocated for GDPR-like laws both in the United States and around the world.


Tim Cook condemns the 'weaponization' of personal data and calls on US to follow EU's lead on GDPR
(Tommy Weir) #2

Tim Cook at a conference on privacy in Brussels, further differentiating Apple from Google and Facebook.


(Seth Anderson) #3

Interesting. I’m jealous of the EU’s GDPR protections even if I don’t know about all of its nuances in great detail.


#4

What makes me really sad is that it is unlikely that any law like the GDPR is unlikely to be proposed, let alone passed, in the US, despite all the continuing bad press and congressional hearings over data breaches and harvesting, ethic cleansings, interference in elections, inciting drug wars, etc., etc.


(Jeremy Roussak) #5

I wouldn’t get too jealous of GDPR if I were you. While in the long term it may prove beneficial, at the moment it is a monumental pain in the neck. The steps which have to be taken to comply are not clear (and I write as a lawyer, albeit with a practice which doesn’t involve the law of privacy or data protection) and widely differing advice is given about the exact degree of paranoia which is appropriate. For example, some say that storing data on Dropbox is unlawful because Dropbox’s servers, or at least some of them, are physically located in the US; others, that US privacy legislation provides adequate protection.

On a more general level, “we can’t do that because of GDPR” has overtaken “we can’t do that because of health and safety” as the mantra of the lazy employee who needs an excuse for not doing something.

Be careful what you wish for; you might get it.

Jeremy


(Adam Engst) #6

Totally agreed, and it’s unfortunate that the largest and most egregious abusers are the firms that are the best able to throw money at coming into technical compliance.

That said, I’m happy to see government actually trying to protect people from corporations that have so completely overstepped the bounds of what’s reasonable, often without the ability to even protect the data they’ve hoovered up from everyone. See: