The Real System Requirements for OS 26

Originally published at: https://tidbits.com/2025/06/12/the-real-system-requirements-for-os-26/

Apple has released developer betas of macOS 26 Tahoe, iOS 26, iPadOS 26, watchOS 26, tvOS 26, and visionOS 26, with public betas scheduled for July and final releases expected in September or October. Many people are eager to learn whether their current hardware will support the new operating systems or if they’ll need to consider upgrading to stay current. Overall, Apple has continued its strategy of dropping support for only a few older models and limiting some advanced features to devices capable of running them. For comparison with last year’s list, see “The Real System Requirements for Apple’s 2024 Operating Systems” (12 July 2024).

In recent years, when Apple previews its upcoming operating systems, it has provided detailed footnotes explaining compatibility for specific features; however, this year, those footnotes are few and far between. The paucity of clarification might be because most of the promoted features are compatible with all supported devices, or perhaps Apple isn’t discussing the features that would require such footnotes. For instance, external display support is reportedly still limited to iPads with an M-series chip, but that’s not mentioned anywhere.

The primary software requirement that remains surrounds Apple Intelligence, which is compatible with the iPhone 15 Pro, iPhone 15 Pro Max, iPhone 16 models, iPad mini (A17 Pro), and iPad and Mac models equipped with an M-series chip. That leaves out many older iPhones and iPads, as well as all Intel-based Macs. Live Translation, a major new feature, requires Apple Intelligence (see “Major Changes Coming in OS 26,” 9 June 2025).

macOS 26 Tahoe Requirements

First off, let’s address the Intel-sized gorilla in the room: Although macOS 26 will still run on some Intel-based Macs, it will be the last major version to do so. During its Platforms State of the Union presentation at WWDC, Apple announced that next year’s macOS 27 will run only on Macs with Apple silicon. Assuming Apple maintains its current policies, macOS 26 will continue to receive security updates for an additional 2 years, meaning that Intel-based Macs will lose security viability in 2028. In short, the writing is on the wall, but there’s no urgent reason to upgrade. An 8- or 9-year run for those Macs isn’t too shabby.

Apple also announced that macOS 27 will be the last version of macOS to include the full Rosetta translation environment, which enables Intel-based code to run on Macs with Apple silicon. Following that, the company will retain a limited set of Rosetta functionality to support older games.

Rosetta announcement

(I recently encountered an unexpected need for Rosetta on my new 14-inch MacBook Pro: the Nisus File Converter app inside Nisus Writer Pro’s app package still uses Intel code and thus requires Rosetta. Since I use it purely from within a Nisus Writer Pro macro, it took me some time to figure out why the macro was failing. ChatGPT eventually gave me the clue I needed.)

Here is the list of Macs that can run macOS 26, which includes all Macs with Apple silicon and four Intel-based Macs:

Mac Chip and Model Years
MacBook Air Apple silicon (2020 and later)
MacBook Pro Intel (16-inch from 2019; 13-inch with four Thunderbolt 3 ports from 2020)
Apple silicon (2020 and later)
iMac Intel (27-inch iMac from 2020)
Apple silicon (2021 and later)
Mac mini Apple silicon (2020 and later)
Mac Pro Intel (2019)
Apple silicon (2023 and later)
Mac Studio Apple silicon (2022 and later)

This list clarifies that Apple has dropped support for these Intel-based models capable of running macOS 15 Sequoia:

  • MacBook Air from 2020
  • 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Pro models from 2018 and 2019, plus the 13-inch model with two Thunderbolt ports from 2020
  • 27-inch iMac from 2019
  • iMac Pro from 2017
  • Mac mini from 2018

iOS 26 Requirements

The story is much simpler in the iPhone lineup. Compared to iOS 18, iOS 26 removes support for the iPhone XR, XS, and XS Max from 2018, making the iPhone 11 from 2019 the oldest model still supported. Here are the compatible devices:

iPhone Introduced Chip
iPhone 16e/16/Plus/Pro/Pro Max 2024, 2025 A18/A18 Pro
iPhone 15/Plus/Pro/Pro Max 2023 A16 Bionic/A17 Pro
iPhone 14/Plus/Pro/Pro Max 2022 A15 Bionic/A16 Bionic
iPhone 13/mini/Pro/Pro Max 2021 A15 Bionic
iPhone 12/mini/Pro/Pro Max 2020 A14 Bionic
iPhone 11/Pro/Pro Max 2019 A13 Bionic
iPhone SE (2nd–3rd generation) 2020, 2022 A15 Bionic

The new Lock Screen, which features a 3D effect and dynamically adjusts the time to fit around the Lock Screen photo, is compatible with only the iPhone 12 and later models.

iPadOS 26 Requirements

Even better, iPadOS 26 drops only the 7th-generation iPad from the list of models that can run iPadOS 18. Note that Apple has changed its naming scheme for iPads to focus on the chip rather than the generation, which is why some models appear in multiple rows below. Supported models include:

iPad Introduced Chip
iPad Pro (M4) 2024 M4
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd–6th generation) 2018, 2020, 2021, 2022 A12X Bionic, A12Z Bionic, M1, M2
iPad Pro 11-inch (1st–4th generation) 2018, 2020, 2021 A12X Bionic, A12Z Bionic, M1
iPad Air 11-inch/13-inch (M2, M3) 2024, 2025 M2, M3
iPad Air (3rd–5th generation) 2019, 2020, 2022 A12 Bionic, A14 Bionic, M1
iPad (A16) 2025 A16
iPad (8th–10th generation) 2020, 2021, 2022 A12 Bionic, A13 Bionic, A14 Bionic
iPad mini (A17 Pro) 2024 A17 Pro
iPad mini (5th–6th generation) 2019, 2021 A12 Bionic, A15 Bionic

Unsurprisingly, the new 3D Lock Screen also has restrictions in the iPad world, where it works on the M-series iPads and the iPad (A16), iPad mini (A17 Pro), and iPad mini (6th generation).

The community has discovered a significant improvement: Stage Manager, which was previously limited to specific iPad models, now works on every iPad that supports iPadOS 26.

watchOS 26 Requirements

The best compatibility story comes with watchOS 26, which maintains the same list as watchOS 11. As always, an iPhone running iOS 26 is required.

Apple Watch Introduced
Apple Watch Ultra 2 2023
Apple Watch Ultra 2022
Apple Watch Series 10 2024
Apple Watch Series 9 2023
Apple Watch Series 8 2022
Apple Watch Series 7 2021
Apple Watch Series 6 2020
Apple Watch SE (2nd generation) 2022

The new wrist flick gesture in watchOS 26 requires either an Apple Watch Series 9 or later, or an Apple Watch Ultra 2; it doesn’t work on the Apple Watch SE.

tvOS 26 Requirements

Although tvOS 26 runs on all Apple TV models dating back to the Apple TV HD from 2015 (formerly known as the 4th-generation Apple TV), two new features have more demanding requirements:

  • Liquid Glass requires an Apple TV 4K (2nd generation and later)
  • Apple Music Sing requires an Apple TV 4K (3rd generation)

visionOS 26 Requirements

Since there has only been one model of the Vision Pro, there’s no concern about compatibility with visionOS 26.

HomePod Software 26 Requirements

Apple said exactly nothing (that I can find, anyway) about the HomePod during its WWDC keynote. MacRumors published a pre-event article mentioning a rumor that HomePod Software 26 would support all existing HomePods, but it provided no additional details.

Since the HomePod lacks a visual interface that could be impacted by Liquid Glass, and no current HomePods have the processing power to utilize Apple Intelligence, there’s probably not much for Apple to say. The bigger question is whether Apple is temporarily sidelining the HomePod while developing a more powerful device—possibly one with a screen—or if the company intends to let the HomePods gradually disappear.

3 Likes

8 posts were split to a new topic: HomePod suffers from slow Siri responses

I don’t get it. A12 is in both iPhone XS Max and iPad mini 5. Still only one of them gets OS 26? And it’s not the XS Max that has 4GB of RAM — it’s the iPad mini 5 that has only 3GB!!??

1 Like

I appreciated that the linked statement from Apple included an extremely rare and explicit statement regarding a product life cycle:

Those systems will continue to receive security updates for 3 years.

6 Likes

I am looking forward to moving to OS 26, although as of now, there is nothing compelling, at least for my needs, in it. However, even if there was, I never install the initial version of the mac OS, as history has clearly shown the first (and next couple) of releases of the mac OS contain bugs. Also, given that I exclusively use third party software for both of my Macs, it’s imperative that they are compatible. For those reasons, I typically wait at least until the .3 version of the new OS is released. That typically is the one that has just about all the prior bugs resolved.

What I hope does not happen is that OS 26 “breaks” the replicator, and thus causes issues with SuperDuper!, the backup program I absolutely depend on. Keeping my finfers crossed that all is ok with that.

It’s puzzling. I’m still using my beloved iPhone XS so it’s also annoying.

1 Like

Hmm. If I’m understanding it right, and assuming a cutoff of 2028, isn’t this in fact just a restatement of existing policy (current + 2 years of updates)?

Or perhaps you’re saying that the fact that this is explicit is what’s new?

Anyway, I’m relieved that my 2020 iMac made it, although I’ve not yet planned what to replace it with, or even whether I should continue to run macOS only on my M3 Pro MBP. I am rather less happy about the EOL of my 2018 Mac Mini—not surprised, just unhappy. The support lifecycle only really works if app devs can continue to target older releases, but Apple tends to bring down the hammer pretty quickly on Xcode support for anything beyond (n−1), so it might be time to hack Windows 11 to run on it.

It will be interesting (if not critical) to see if my 1980s DOS app Open Access will still run in macOS 26 under 64-bit DOSBOX. It has weathered the likes of Windows 95 … OSX and macOS so far, thanks to the gaming community.

2 Likes

The only two differences I see that could also play into the decision are:

  • The iPhone XS Max has more pixels on the screen, so it might require more power/memory to drive them for Liquid Glass.
  • The iPhone XS Max is considered Vintage in terms of support status, whereas the iPhone 11 (the next year) is still supported.

1 Like

I was commenting on the explicitness.

I may be mistaken, but as far as I can tell, the “current + two years” policy has been inferred from practice, not officially documented.

2 Likes

It took time, but the OCLP developers did a nice job getting Sequoia to run on T1 Macs. It will be interesting to see if they can get Tahoe running on unsupported T2 Macs. I see that people have been able to get it at least to boot on some machines going back to 2008.

1 Like

(cue Funeral March for a Marionette)

This is not a huge surprise, even though it’s regrettable. I purchased this machine, with upgraded video, graphics processor, and 128gb RAM, at an inopportune moment due to pandemic production requirements. If I had been able to wait about a month, I’d have had the 2020 model, or one of the first M1 models just hitting the market.

But video needed to be pumped out on a tight deadline, and I could no longer tolerate the 90 minutes my 2012 iMac needed to render a 30 minute video.

Like that machine, which is about to be turned into an ingestion station for my DVC-era Firewire video cam and tapes, the 2019 Intel iMac will be useful for at least another decade. Unlike its predecessor it still feels wicked-fast, and I only pushed it to its limit a couple of times. If it receives security updates into 2028 that will be a good-enough boost.

3 Likes

But my regular iPhone XS has less pixels (2.7m) compared to iPad mini 5 (3.1m). And iPhone XS Max (3.3m)

All graphics are done on GPU which is the same across all 3. So perhaps it’s down to thermals from the extra GPU work required, which should be better on iPad mini? Mysterious.

I’m betting the Vintage support status is the more important factor.

1 Like

I think you’re right. Age

Since “macOS 27 will be the last version of macOS to include the full [Rosetta translation environment], which enables Intel-based code to run on Macs with Apple silicon” will there be some app out there that will tell us what programs that we are running will need to be upgraded or replaced before we loose their functionality? I remember such an app was available when Apple stopped supporting 32-bit programs.

This should do the trick: GitHub - DigiDNA/Silicon

macOS already tells you that.

System Profiler > Software > Applications and then sort by Kind.

Anything that says 32-bit or Intel should be on your radar for replacement.

1 Like