Taming Email Overload: Google’s CC Daily Briefing Agent

Originally published at: Taming Email Overload: Google’s CC Daily Briefing Agent - TidBITS

Do you feel as though you’re suffering from email overload? I suspect that’s true for many people, and I long ago dispensed with the illusion that I could somehow catch up on my email and reach some fictional Inbox Zero, however briefly.

I receive and read roughly 90 legitimate messages per day between personal mail, mailing lists, and newsletters. That’s apparently high for average office workers, but rather moderate for a tech journalist—being less well known has its perks. I filter important automated messages out of sight and file away transactional emails about orders. (I detest the multiple messages from online retailers providing regular updates on the status of some shipment.) I’ve culled my mail to this point by being ruthless about cutting off anything I don’t want that includes an Unsubscribe link.

I can keep up with this level of email volume because I read very quickly, and I’ve become even faster at scanning unknown message content to see if it warrants a closer read. I also try to reply to direct personal emails or deal with important administrative messages right away to avoid losing track of them. Admittedly, I sometimes misunderstand a message and reply unhelpfully because I read it too quickly and form an erroneous impression. So it goes…

My feeling of email overload stems from my strategy for dealing with messages that contain information I might want to revisit, ideas for articles, or action items. Most email triage techniques recommend moving such messages to a task manager or at least tagging them, but I’ve learned that if I do, I’ll never see them again—it’s the kiss of death. In contrast, if I mark messages to keep frontmost as unread, there’s at least a chance that I’ll get to them later. This strategy may not be ideal, but it largely works for me.

Nevertheless, the hundreds of unread messages mocking me from my inbox push me towards experimentation with alternative email systems that promise to solve all my problems. Surely AI is the answer, given that AI is the answer to everything these days! I’ve been experimenting with AI-powered email assistants recently, and while none have made a difference for me, your mileage may vary. If you’ve run across a similar app that has made it into your everyday email use, be sure to share details in the comments.

Google Labs CC

The first of these tools I want to cover is a Google Labs experiment called CC, which Google describes as “a new AI productivity agent that connects your Gmail, Calendar and Drive to deliver a personalized briefing every morning.” What CC actually does is send you an email every morning with three sections: top-of-mind topics, a recap of your calendar events for the day, and an FYI section that surfaces events and facts from your email. I’ve been receiving daily briefings from CC since the beginning of March.

A CC message

For the most part, CC was good at identifying important items in my email and calendar. As you can see above, it recently noted that I had to verify my phone number and (new) carrier for several bank accounts, reminded me to check in for a medical visit, collected administrative tasks I had discussed via email, and more. Events on my calendar usually—but not universally—appeared in the briefing.

However, as you can imagine, Google’s AI also identifies a lot of utterly irrelevant things, so I’ve had to teach it my preferences. You do that in natural language, by replying to CC’s email, and it’s a rather satisfying process, given how amenable AIs generally are.

For instance, it wanted to tell me about connection requests from LinkedIn, reminders of upcoming deliveries and subscription renewals, and announcements of races that I have no connection with or interest in participating in. To train it, I replied to a message and, under each section I didn’t like, told CC to ignore future items in that category, getting back this reply.

Corrections response from CC

Nevertheless, I continually encountered problems that didn’t seem to respond to my feedback:

  • CC frequently swapped names in messages from the Finger Lakes Runners Club Discourse forum, presumably because the messages lacked email addresses that matched the posters’ identities. Since I had already read the messages, I knew who had sent them and was annoyed by the mistake.
  • The CC calendar section enthusiastically told me about events that appeared in my email—but that weren’t on my calendar—with no awareness of whether or not the event had any meaning to me at all. Just because I received the Ithaca City School District newsletter doesn’t mean I’m going to the middle school concert mentioned in it.
  • The FYI section was particularly random, covering how Amazon is discontinuing store and library access for Kindle devices older than 2012, an upcoming bank holiday, Zoom Docs being renamed Zoom Canvas, and local road maintenance affecting travel. Since items in this section are random, they’re hard to train away.

Why CC Didn’t Work for Me

But the main problem I encountered was that I could never train CC out of its insistence on telling me about messages I had already read and sometimes even replied to. My memory is far from perfect, but if I’ve read a message and left it marked read, I consider it closed. Seeing those messages appear in the next morning’s briefing made me question whether I had actually seen and processed them.

Beyond the specifics of how well it works, there’s a deeper problem with CC for me. Ultimately, it didn’t provide any value because it is inherently duplicative. Even if I could get it to stop reminding me about messages I’ve already read, it’s not a help to be told about messages I haven’t yet read, because I’ll still need to read them to understand what they’re saying. Similarly, I don’t need to be told about events on my calendar—the fact that I’ve put them there and that they’ll remind me at the relevant time is more than sufficient.

Your experience could differ, however. If you lead an incredibly busy, highly scheduled life where you stand no chance of reading all your email, CC might be worth trying. Right now, CC’s waitlist is open only to Gmail users in the US and Canada who are over 18 and have a consumer Google account. If you decide to stop using CC, you can clear your data by disconnecting from the service on Google’s Linked Apps page.

Alternatively, consider hiring a human assistant.

1 Like

Eggzackly!

Although the recent advances in coding and medical/pattern recognition are stunning, the main thrust of the big AI companies for personal “assistants” leaves me absolutely befuddled. Right there in your description of this “service” is example after example of why we should all avoid them like the worst of plagues. They are wrong so much of the time; yet, people insist on using them because they’re “free” and shiny new when if they hired a human to do this stuff with these results the assistant would be fired within days.

I’ve jealously guarded my email for decades so I have nowhere near the daily volume that people often report but recently something found my main business address and the spam volume has tripled (low before but now triple that) so I’m beginning to understand the email assault both legitimate and non-legitimate that people are enduring.

You can start by canceling all your newsletters. That’ll make you feel better. . . .

Daily life “AI” is incredibly dumb and frankly dangerous because in fact it just parses language and not life.

Thanks for the research, Adam!

Dave

3 Likes

As a journalist, I learned to quick scan incoming mail when it was on paper, and for many years I could scan email very effectively. However, my aging eyes suffer from floaters have made my scanning ineffective, which has slowed me down greatly.

Like Dafuki, I have little hope for AI to solve the problem. A spam filter totally screwed up my email account by bouncing emails from clients and legitimate sources and telling them that my account was closed. It didn’t break everything, so it took me weeks to find the problem and it was only possible because I had friends at my primary client whom I could could tell me what was happening on that end. Then it took weeks to move mail on my personal domain to another server and try to fix problems the AI errors created. That’s not my only problem with AI; it’s just the worst.

The bottom line for me is that I’m having to change the types of journalism I had been doing because I can no longer gather information as effectively as I had been. Part of that is age and vision problem, but part is the digital torrent.

2 Likes

I really like reading your balanced takes on actually using AI, since it helps me judge whether I should put my time and energy into trying it myself. I’m a retired artist and graphic designer (still dabbling) and your insights into using AI to design a page or quickly churn out anonymous-looking art seem very sound to me.

But the time and effort I would need to train an AI to do anything else I might want to do still seems way too inexact and sloppy to pique my interest, while the security vulnerabilities that it opens up, while too rarely discussed to be obvious, give me a great deal of reluctance. We’ve all been burned before, right?

Please keep up the frustrating and tedious work of exploring it for us. My suspicion is that in five years we’ll all be looking back at this phase of Artificial Intelligence as the era of Fake Intelligence.

1 Like

“I’m so sorry, Adam.”

Complete turn-off.

I’d like for the developers of these bots to stop insinuating I’m a moron. I’d be much more inclined to give them a try.

I keep an “ancient” style. My Inbox has never exceeded 1,000 e-mail messeges, ever. (Currently 503 messages are in Apple Mail.) My method: I don’t trust Mail app, I do trust plain text files and text editor. I have a few folders, each filled with a bunch of .txt files. I have a file for Adam (actually 7 files for Adam in these 17 years), a file for Peter, a file for my sister, and so on.

In Mail.app, only the latest messages that need replies are kept, everything else is deleted, so the number of messages is always kept low in Mail.app.

Important messages are all kept in .txt files. One .txt file contains the whole back-and-forth conversation with one person. Jedit Omega.app, the text editor of my choice, can handle huge .txt files, has powerful multi-file search, and can find everything I need from the e-mail folder that contains a bunch of .txt files.

Apparently, “CC is available only for Gmail consumer accounts at the moment,” so I can’t sign up for the trial with the e-mail address I actually use — and thus testing would be useless. Maybe I’ll play with it once it’s open to Google Workspace accounts.

Meantime, the biggest question for me is: Can CC not just TELL ME about the mound of e-mail waiting for me, but DISMISS it? I’d want to be able to select checkboxes for each of its little summaries and click a single “Begone!” button to delete or archive all of the messages represented.

If after scanning CC’s morning briefing I still have to go one-by-one through the messages it’s already told me about, I’m not interested. That sounds like it’s what would trigger for me something like your confusion about whether you’d actually seen and processed a message.

Well, a couple of years ago Gmail did simply dismiss a batch of invoices by putting it into the “promotions” folder of a group for which I was treasurer. Since Gmail had never bothered to tell me that they were not putting bills into same folder as spam, I didn’t see the bills and thus didn’t pay them until WordPress closed our web site for nonpayment. It took quite a while to clean up the mess.

I’ve been very impressed with a program called Extra on iOS (I think a MacOS version is coming). The only downside is that my office won’t let me connect it to our office mail, but if you have a Google account it’s well worth trying out. Https://extra.email

No, CC provides links to open the messages it references, but it can’t mark anything as read or archive anything on its own.

Extra is another app that I’m planning to write about.

1 Like

The Extra app is now available to all. Impressive, if you’re a GMail user. I have about six email addresses I need to use so it will be limited for me but a very welcome new arrival.