My First 700-Mile EV Road Trip—What Worked and What I’d Change

Originally published at: My First 700-Mile EV Road Trip—What Worked and What I’d Change - TidBITS

As I wrote in “Living with Digital Key 2 on the Hyundai IONIQ 5” (6 April 2026), I recently took my first long trip in an electric car. While I’m still far from an expert, I learned a lot and am looking forward to our next trip in June.

For this trip, I drove from Ithaca down to Arlington, VA, near Washington, DC. The trip was about 350 miles, and our Hyundai IONIQ 5 has an advertised range of 269 miles. I knew that the advertised range was far from guaranteed, but as you’ll see, it’s merely a starting point when planning how far you can actually drive.

Starting Charge

In fact, the first question is what constitutes a full charge. Generally speaking, electric vehicles prefer to keep their lithium-ion batteries between 20% and 80% charged, just as Apple optimizes charging for the MacBook, iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch. You might think of 80% as the effective maximum, but that’s just leaving miles on the table. There’s no problem with charging an electric car to 100%—you just don’t want to leave it there. The ideal scenario is to charge the car so that it hits 100% just before you have to leave.

I didn’t do that. I intended to, but the Tuesday night before I was scheduled to leave on Thursday morning, I got really sick and felt sufficiently horrible all day Wednesday that I planned to cancel the trip entirely. So I interrupted the IONIQ 5’s charging at 88%. Happily, on Thursday morning, I woke up feeling fine, so I decided that if I could get enough done before lunch, I would leave after lunch and skip the conference’s welcome reception. I re-enabled charging, but we’re using only a 110-volt outlet at 8 amps (0.88 kW), so we can add only about 1% of battery charge per hour. I wound up getting it only to 90%.

A brief aside so the units below make sense. Charging speed (power) is measured in kilowatts (kW), while battery capacity and energy consumed are measured in kilowatt-hours (kWh). Think of it like water: kW is how fast the faucet flows; kWh is how much fills the bucket. The IONIQ 5 has an 84 kWh battery.

Takeaway #1: Plan to start trips with 100% charge to provide more headroom when planning stops.

Planning the Route

Numerous apps and services show you where EV chargers are located, and you should amass a collection of them. I currently have PlugShare (an essential aggregator of charger locations with ratings and reviews that can tell you whether a charging location is worthwhile) and the apps for the Electrify America, ChargePoint, EVgo, and Tesla networks. They all provide maps of their charger locations, often with information about which chargers are broken or in use. But the real reason to download them in advance is so you can set up accounts ahead of time, rather than fussing with them at charging locations. It may be possible to pay with just a credit card, but I didn’t want to bet on that.

All that said, the best starting point seems to be A Better Route Planner (ABRP), which combines a database of charging locations with highly sophisticated route planning. It started as a personal passion project in 2016, became a company in 2018, and was purchased by EV maker Rivian in 2023.

What sets ABRP apart is its attention to the myriad details that play into trip planning. It starts with your particular EV and then takes into account the current temperature, route elevation, how long you’re willing to stop, and, most importantly, the percent of your charge you want to arrive with. Give it all those variables, and it suggests several routes, much like Maps gives you several driving options. ABRP is free, but a $5-per-month or $50-per-year premium subscription also takes into account variables such as wind speed, temperature changes, live data from the car, and charger availability, plus CarPlay compatibility. In retrospect, I should have subscribed to the premium version.

ABRP recommended that I charge in Harrisburg, PA, which was perfect because I was planning to share a meal with our podcasting friend Chuck Joiner there anyway. It identified an Electrify America location with six stalls and a theoretical maximum of 350 kW charging, though the average was 180 kW. The distance was 218 miles, and ABRP estimated I’d arrive with a 10% charge. That seemed like enough to find a nearby alternative if something was wrong with the Electrify America site.

A Better Route Planner route

Takeaway #2: Make sure you have all the apps you’ll need, including ABRP, PlugShare, and the main charging network apps. Plan with ABRP, but verify charger data with the network’s app.

First Leg of the Journey

After lunch, I hit the road, with the IONIQ 5 counting down from its estimated range of 268 miles and Apple Maps from 218 miles, giving me what seemed like a reasonable buffer of 50 miles. I put the IONIQ 5 in Eco mode, and since it was a warm, sunny day, I kept the climate control turned off entirely so it wouldn’t use any additional power. Had it been winter, I would have needed the heat, which would have reduced my range.

I also used the IONIQ 5’s advanced cruise control features to keep to the speed limit unless a car ahead of me was going slower, at which point it matched that car’s speed until I decided to pass. From what I can tell, the best efficiency in highway driving comes between 50 and 60 miles per hour, though I wasn’t willing to drive slower than the 65-mph speed limit on I-81. I suspect that driving 70 or 75 would significantly increase energy usage and thus reduce range.

On this first trip, I didn’t quite internalize that the IONIQ 5 actually has three estimates: minimum, maximum, and one in the center in larger type. I don’t remember what the minimum estimate was, but it may have been more accurate—as I drove, I watched the difference between remaining distance and remaining estimated miles drop from 50.

At some point, I used the ChatGPT app in CarPlay to run the numbers and get an estimated percent charge on arrival. It reported that I would arrive with a mere 3%, which I found decidedly uncomfortable. Unfortunately, I was in a less populated area of Pennsylvania with very few chargers nearby, so when I chickened out, my best option was a 6.2 kW ChargePoint charger in Pottsville.

It used the hefty J1772 connector, and although the 2026 Hyundai IONIQ 5 uses the smaller, more elegant Tesla-originated NACS connector, Hyundai provides adapters for both J1772 (for AC charging) and the even larger CCS connector for DC fast charging.

I don’t know what the situation is with other EVs, but it seems to me that being limited to a single connector type would be extremely stressful. Some stations offer multiple plug types, but none of those I stopped at did. Even having the adapters made me consider physical security a bit more—if they were stolen during a trip, I’d be limited to Tesla charging stations until I could replace them. Not all EVs can use Tesla charging stations, even with an adapter, but I don’t yet understand all the variables there.

Takeaway #3: Make sure to get and protect adapters for the three different connector types.

Over the next 97 minutes, while the charger slowly added 10% to my battery, I sat in the car and wrote up the unexpected release of macOS 26.4.1. My charging session cost $0.48 per kWh, and I ended up paying $5.02 for the extra 10 kWh.

ChargePoint session

Takeaway #4: With appropriate hardware and connectivity, time spent charging doesn’t have to be wasted. Work has to get done at some point.

After all that, driving the remaining distance to Harrisburg didn’t consume as much energy as I had anticipated. I later realized why: it’s almost entirely downhill from Pottsville to Harrisburg. I arrived at the Harrisburg Electrify America chargers with 16% charge left, meaning that if I hadn’t stopped in Pottsville, I would have arrived with 6% charge—tight but not down to my last electrons.

Dinner and a Charge and Another Charge

In Harrisburg, Chuck Joiner met me at the Electrify America station, which was a little tricky to find—it’s worth navigating directly to the station rather than a mall or nearby store because the stations are often around back or in somewhat hidden locations.

IONIQ 5 charging

Having set up my Electrify America account before leaving home paid off—I just tapped my phone to the stall to start charging at $0.56 per kWh. The MyHyundai app told me that I’d hit 80% charge in 38 minutes, and Electrify America provides a 10-minute grace period before charging $0.40 per minute for idle time. Even though Chuck and I ate at a nearby BBQ place that served us quickly, I still ended up paying for two extra minutes of idle time. Overall, the session cost $31.02 for 55 kWh, and charging speed maxed out at only 90 kW (it was advertised as a 320 kW station), presumably because other stalls were in use at the same time.

Electrify American session

Takeaway #5: If you need to get a meal on the road, charging may take less time than it would to eat. Pay attention to avoid excessive idle time fees.

In retrospect, I should have set the MyHyundai app to allow the car to charge to 100%; I had set it earlier to limit both AC and DC charging to 80%, and in the excitement of seeing Chuck for the first time in years, I didn’t think to change it. Charging speed slows as the battery approaches 100%, but it would have been nice to have a little more time for dinner anyway. The IONIQ 5 charges more quickly than many EVs thanks to its 800-volt architecture, but charging times will vary by station, depending on their effective power output.

I had 134 miles to drive to Virginia and wanted to charge before parking the car for the next few days. That way, when I left, I’d have a reasonably full battery. ABRP had identified an Electrify America station at a Hyundai dealership in Alexandria, VA, not far from the hotel in Arlington. But I was navigating there using Apple Maps, and when I arrived, three of the four stalls were in use, and the fourth was out of order. Oddly, there was a ChargePoint stall right next to the Electrify America stalls, but when I tried to use it, it told me I wasn’t authorized and to talk with my EV Admin.

By this time, it was 11:00 PM, and I was getting tired. Luckily, there was another Electrify America location less than a mile away, with an open charger. I wasn’t as low as in Harrisburg and the max charging speed was 162 kW, so bringing the battery up to 80% took only 18 minutes. (I caught up on email.) When I connect a high-speed DC charger to the IONIQ 5, I swear I can hear a giant sucking sound as it pulls in the power. The session cost another $22.62 for 40 kWh.

I hadn’t planned to be doing all this late at night, but it worked out surprisingly well. Traffic was almost non-existent, rather than the expected scrum, and although I had to try a second charger, I got the impression there was generally less competition at that time of day.

Takeaway #6: It’s worth checking charger availability in real-time as you drive. Had I used ABRP’s premium tier with its mapping, or had Tonya been in the car to check availability in PlugShare or the Electrify America app, I would have gone straight to the second charger.

Driving Home

After the conference and spending the night at some nearby friends’ house, I retraced my route home. Although I could have chosen a different route and charging network, I was tired and feeling a little under the weather, so I decided to use the same Harrisburg charging station. This time, however, I made sure to increase the limit to 100% before trotting over to a Five Guys for a hamburger and fries. The MyHyundai app told me I had 45 minutes, and although I didn’t wolf down my food, I got back to the car with only 1 minute left. The session cost $31.47 for 56 kWh.

The rest of the trip home was uneventful—I continued to drive the speed limit and used the air conditioning only briefly a few times when the sun heated up the interior a bit more than was comfortable.

Here’s what’s weird. The first drive from Ithaca to Harrisburg consumed 84% of the IONIQ 5’s battery. That’s why I was so concerned about charging to 100% in Harrisburg on the way home. However, I arrived home with an unexpected 30% of the charge remaining—I had consumed only 70% of the battery. Why did the drive to Harrisburg consume 14% more power than the same drive in reverse?

At first, I thought it might be related to elevation. But when I checked the route elevation in Google Maps, I found there was 11,000 feet of climb to Harrisburg and 12,000 feet on the way back, the opposite of what might explain the difference. Otherwise, all the major variables seemed the same: speed, temperature, and use of climate control. The only remaining possibility I can think of is wind speed. If I were driving into a south headwind on the way down or with a south tailwind on the way home—or both—that could account for the significant difference in energy use.

For the next trip, I plan to subscribe to the premium tier of ABRP, which claims to account for wind speed and can communicate directly with the car for more accurate estimates. Because it also supports CarPlay, I’ll try using it for routing, which should also help adjust for charger availability as needed.

Takeaway #7: Assuming you have the time and don’t worry about hogging a charger for a few more minutes, charge to 100% while on the road.

One final note: For the entire trip, I spent $90.13 on public charging and drove 711 miles, which works out to $0.12 per mile. In our old Subaru Outback, I would have been extremely lucky to get 30 miles to the gallon, and gas was priced at about $4.29 per gallon. I would have consumed 23.7 gallons of gas and spent $101.67, or $0.14 per mile.

So while driving the IONIQ 5 cost $11.54 less and was way more fun, the Outback would have gotten me there faster, since it needed only one stop for gas the entire trip, eliminating the 97 minutes in Pottsville and the 18 minutes in Alexandria. But if I’d charged to 100% at home and not needed the Pottsville stop, I would have been comparing a gas station fill-up with the 18-minute stop in Alexandria—faster, but not hugely so.

I can’t wait for our next trip in June!

 

6 Likes

One consideration when planning a journey is that (for some cars) the built-in navigation needs to be used for pre-conditioning to kick in ahead of reaching a charger. That warms up the battery so that the charging rate will be faster. Other cars allow you to trigger pre-conditioning manually which means that (so long as you remember) you can totally ignore the built-in software.

4 Likes

Long-distance travel still seems to be the Achilles heel of electric cars. I live about an hour from Harrisburg, where you stopped to charge, in the middle of nowhere, and when a friend visited home not too long ago he thought he would “live green” and rent an electric car out of the Harrisburg airport. Then he had to drive back to Harrisburg every time he wanted a charge because there were no places nearby that had the correct adapter.

On a side note, I recognize the spot where you powered up, and bet I know which BBQ place you went to — it’s not far from the Costco closest to us :grin:

I have a Volkswagen ID.4 Pro S AWD. I have tried to use A Better Route Planner with a bluetooth ODB scanner for real-time reporting of battery level. I used the trial, which is available via the web, to drive up to San Francisco planning a stop in San Jose for Pho which should be well within the range of the car. Driving at freeway speeds of around 72 mph on 101-N with a strong headwind made ABRP tell me to drop my speed to 50 mph to make the charging stop. This is completely unacceptable to me so I switched to the built-in nav. While it is ugly, it added a 10 minute stop at Electrify America in Salinas and has real-time charger availability.

On the way back, I charged in SF and again nearing Paso Robles, ABRP was telling me to slow down to make it to my house. Again unacceptable as there are many charges in Paso that I could stop at for 5-10 minutes.

I cannot figure out how to get ABRP to stop suggesting dropping speed to extend range. I would much rather store for 10-15 minutes than slow down to 50mph on a freeway.

This is my 2nd electric car, the other being a short range VW eGolf for around town and I am thinking it will be my last. The ID.4 allows CarPlay apps to take over the barnacle for turn by turn but this means I cannot run Waze or Apple Maps for general directions and traffic at the same time as built-in nav for charging.

In my reading on EVs I’ve seen both pros and cons of BYD,

to my mechanical engineer’s eye, this chemistry loox impressive.

P.S. FWIW @ace ive been knocked flat myself for a week. R u sure #TidBITS is not contagious?!

:cold_face:

:laughing:

:innocent:

The article says ABPR when it should be ABRP. Great article. I have a 2024 Ioniq 5 and planning my first long trip in a couple of months.

2 Likes

Well, there are some things you can count on in EV-land and one is that there will always be announcements of AMAZING new battery technology NOW ENTERING PRODUCTION. (Another is that Tesla will deliver unsupervised full self driving by the end of the current year, whichever year we’re in.) Battery technology has come a long, long way but most of the amazing breakthrough announcements haven’t (yet?) come to fruition. It does feel that, between solid-state anodes and alternative chemistries we’re on the cusp of a brave new world of automotive batteries.

We also need to keep in mind that, even after amazing new “charge from 20% to 80% in 2 minutes” technologies actually enter production, it will take a new breed of chargers to deliver the 2 megawatts plus that BYD is touting. Even after those chargers are actually available, you won’t be able to just plunk half a dozen of them down at the corner gas station, because adding a 12 MW load to the existing infrastructure is a lot more complicated than just hooking the wires up to the local grid. (For reference, the entire output of the original San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station was less than 500 MW.)

It will all be worth it when it’s here. I’ve been driving electric since 2018 and I’ll never go back, but I don’t pretend that there aren’t serious compromises one has to make to be electric in our fossil-fueled world.

1 Like

I have had similar EV experiences in Australia:

One big advantage here is the standardisation of charging plugs - no adapters are needed. Also, although Australia is way behind Europe, there seem to be more public EV chargers available than you found on your trip.

With 240V house power in Australia the charging rate at home is much better than with 120V systems. I will be charging my EV from “free” rooftop solar this sunny afternoon in Sydney. Fast charging on long trips is much more expensive but, as you found, still less than an ICE vehicle.

The long term maintenance costs of EVs should be less than ICE vehicles. Battery life of the latest models is not an issue - it is expected that the batteries will outlast the cars. There are even successful trials of ex-EV batteries being used to provide community grid electricity.

Yes - travelling at 60mph instead of 70mph consumes far less energy, mainly due to aerodynamics. In the 1970s oil crisis a 55mph speed limit was introduced in the USA to save fuel. As it happened there was also a big drop in road fatalities. A study that I came across estimated that every minute saved by travelling at the higher speed was offset by a one minute reduction in life expectancy due to an increase in the risk of a fatal crash.

5 Likes

…while paving the way for 1984 American hard rock anthem “I Can’t Drive 55”.

(apologies to Philomena Cunk)

4 Likes

Good to see this kind of thing working for you Adam. I regularly do 2,500 mile roadtrips and use just the one app, the one built into the car. Type in the destination and the car works out the rest. Knows which chargers are in use, knows my consumption, knows to pre-condition the battery before arriving at the charger etc. Sure I’m driving a Tesla an$ for good reason, they are the Apple of EV’s when it comes to software and experience.

I hope all EV’s will one day operate is the same way that Tesla has been doing for over a decade. There is a reason the cars are loved - and it has nothing to do Musk and everything to do with getting it right.

NB: get a level II charger at home, please.

3 Likes

Well said, and always worth repeating that speed increases reduce their benefit the faster you go, from 10 to 20 is a doubling, from 60 to 70 is merely a sixth more, etc.

2 Likes

That is a key point. Here in the UK the electricity overnight is a fraction of the cost of fast charging station pricing (around 7p per kWh as opposed to around 80/90p per kWh at most fast chargers). So it makes sense to do as much charging at home as possible - and be able to do it quickly. Charging from a plug socket is incredibly slow. I don’t know if the US has cheaper overnight rates for electricity but being able to add a substantial charge overnight at home is a significant advantage in itself as, for us, it removes the need to fast charge at all for all but the longest journeys.

Of course the typical UK journey is nowhere near as far as you might go in the US! And (for many people) they don’t have a driveway and therefore can’t easily charge an electric car from their home.

There is not single “US rate” for electricity. It will vary quite a bit depending on your location (state, region, city), what power company you have for service (in many locations, you have a choice), service category, and other factors.

But as a reference, my most recent electric bill (Dominion Electric, in Loudoun County, Virginia) shows:

  • 897 kWh usage
  • $105.69 electric supply charges (generation, transmission and fuel)
    This comes to about 11.8 cents/kWh. At current exchange rates, this comes to about GBP 8.7p. A bit higher than what you cited (for overnight pricing).
  • $45.91 distribution service charges (not sure if this is based on usage or some other factor)
  • $7.08 taxes

I do not subscribe to power with different rates for different times of day. If I would switch to such a plan, then my night rates would be lower and my day rates would be higher.

It can cost $1,200 to $2,000 to get a 220V Level 2 charger installed in a house. We’ve looked into it! Sounds like a lot, but most of it is the external box and charging port, as opposed to the electrical labor (we got a $600 estimate for that part).

However, I realized we had an active but unused 220V dryer outlet after moving our dryer across the basement. And we have the dryer vent hole, too, right there. So when the time comes, I can get a standard cable ($250) and run it from the dryer outlet through the vent, and then hang it under a waterproof housing when not in use ($50).

1 Like

Different areas have different pricing overnight. I’m in Seattle and our electrical charges are absurdly cheap because of nuclear and hydro that were built in the Northwest and came with perpetual rate arrangements. Seattle is 97–99% renewables at any given time, pretending nuclear and hydro are renewable, plus wind and solar. We pay about 14¢/kWh (10p).

Adam, I’d also suggest it would be interesting to compare fuel/charging plus vehicle cost per mile. Supposedly, about half as much per mile to run an EV than IC when factoring in maintenance and other incidentals besides gasoline versus electricity.

In some places, like Connecticut, electricity is so expensive, it’s hard to make the EV math work at home or with chargers!

Some useful information about EV running costs here:

2 Likes

I did exactly that with my old house. Paid an Electrician $350 to put in the new socket right under the existing panel - there was space for an extra 240v supply, and then took the rebate from the utility company for putting it in. Cost zero. This was 2018 for a house that was 15 years old, no no panel upgrade required. On my next house, I had them put in the 240v sockets on each side of the garage as we had two EV’s.

The problems happen with older houses that need a panel upgrade, at which point it can get costly but from my perspective if you can’t level II charge at home, you should consider whether an EV is a viable option. If you can it’s great, you leave home everytime with a full tank of electrons. Don’t miss gas stations at all.

1 Like

Pottsville, perhaps? :slight_smile:

Mission BBQ. I wasn’t expecting the military-themed decor, but Chuck explained it ahead of time. The food was good!

That’s distressing—it sounds like it’s doing a worse job with real-time data. What if you use it without the IDB scanner?

Kind of amazing how once I got the order wrong the first time I typed it, I was able to keep it going consistently after that. Fixed.

It’s complicated—our garage has only a 50-amp panel, so electricians are working out the load calculations to determine whether the wire in place now can handle a 100-amp load with new breakers, and whether the 200-amp circuit from the road has enough headroom. There appear to be three possibilities:

  • We need more power from the road. Way too expensive (numbers like $20,000 were suggested)
  • We need to pull new cable to the garage. Probably doable through existing conduit, but in the several thousand range.
  • We can just replace the breakers. Cheap and easy, though it would likely require some internal rewiring in the garage as well to get a charger to the right location.

In the meantime, though, it’s really not being a problem to charge very slowly on a normal 110V, 8 amp circuit. (The IONIQ 5’s charger can do 6, 8, or 12 amps, but when I set it to 12 amps, the circuit breaker would eventually trip.) Yes, it’s an hour for 1%, but we don’t drive the car most days (working at home) and most of the time when we do drive it, it’s in Ithaca simply because we need two cars at the same time or I need to carry something that’s too large for the Leaf.

As @Shamino said, it varies widely. The vast majority of our electric power comes from our 18.9 kW solar array, and in New York State, that power is sold back to the grid at retail prices, regardless of time of day. So in California, it makes sense to get whole-house batteries that you can use when power is expensive, whereas in New York, it makes no difference. Our system is a little undersized, so we pay for power for a few months in the late winter/early spring when the extra we built up over the summer and fall has been used up.

The numbers for the trip showed that the EV’s fuel costs would have been about 10% lower, comparing only the expensive public charging: 48-56 cents per kWh versus 12-20 cents per kWh for private charging. The EPA mileage estimates are also indicative—I forget if the Subaru clocked in at precisely 30 MPG or not, but the Leaf is 128 MPGe, and the IONIQ 5 is 98 MPGe.

I was also struck by how having to pay attention to charging locations felt like trips from when I was a lot younger, when you had to pay a lot more attention to where you were getting gas because there weren’t so many gas stations littering up the world. :slight_smile:

2 Likes

I used this method without problems for at least 3 years until we did a bigger project to electrify our old house and included a new external charger. There may still be state, local and/or utility incentives to help with up front cost and the result is great.