M4 MacBook Air Cuts Price, Boosts Performance, Camera, and Display Support

Originally published at: M4 MacBook Air Cuts Price, Boosts Performance, Camera, and Display Support - TidBITS

Although the just-introduced M4 MacBook Air isn’t dramatically different from its M3 predecessor, it nonetheless brings notable developments that make it a standout in Apple’s lineup. Noteworthy upgrades include the powerful M4 chip, a new 12-megapixel Center Stage camera that enhances video calls, and the capability to drive two external displays with the lid open. It’s now priced at $100 less than its predecessor and comes in a new sky blue color.

M4 MacBook Air

Ever since Steve Jobs pulled the first MacBook Air from an envelope, Apple’s thinnest, lightest Mac laptop has captivated users. However, that compact size often required tradeoffs such as limited performance, smaller screen sizes, and fewer ports. Recent updates, though, have addressed many of these shortcomings.

Once the MacBook Air transitioned to Apple silicon with the M1 chip, it eliminated most performance concerns. I regularly work on an M1 MacBook Air without experiencing any slowdowns, barring intensive tasks like virtualizing the crufty Windows app HyTek Meet Manager in VMware Fusion. The M2 version further enhanced performance, brought back MagSafe charging to free up a Thunderbolt port, and introduced a 15-inch model for those prioritizing screen size over portability. The M3 MacBook Air not only boosted performance but also supported driving two displays with the lid closed, meaning that it required an external keyboard and trackpad.

The M4 MacBook Air is the culmination of that work. I don’t want to say that it’s the ultimate MacBook Air that Apple will ever build—at minimum, future Apple silicon chips will deliver even faster performance—but within the bounds of what defines a MacBook Air, it makes no compromises. Let’s examine the changes.

M4 Chip Boosts Performance

Apple rarely shares performance comparisons with the previous generation of chips, and this is no exception. The company says only that the M4 MacBook Air is up to twice as fast as the M1 MacBook Air and up to 23 times faster than the fastest Intel-based MacBook Air. However, benchmarks indicate that the M4 may be approximately 20% faster than the M3, partly due to two additional CPU cores (10 versus 8).

Additional performance gains come from a faster Neural Engine and increased memory bandwidth of 120 Gbps, compared to 100 Gbps. For memory-intensive tasks, the M4 MacBook Air now starts with 16 GB of unified memory, with options for 24 GB and a new maximum of 32 GB. I think 16 GB is sufficient for most users, but upgrading to 24 GB could help future-proof your purchase, and it automatically includes the faster of the two available M4 chips.

Although the MacBook Pro line offers significantly more performance with the M4 Pro and M4 Max chips, the M4 MacBook Air provides more than enough power for most uses.

Despite the performance improvements, battery life remains the same as in the M2 and M3 models. This could be attributed to a slightly larger 53.8-watt-hour battery replacing the previous 52.6-watt-hour battery.

12-Megapixel Center Stage Camera

The only other notable hardware change is the move from the mediocre 1080p FaceTime HD camera to a 12-megapixel Center Stage camera with support for Desk View.

Apple was slow to up its webcam game when videoconferencing became a routine part of many people’s lives. While the 1080p FaceTime HD camera introduced in the M2 MacBook Air was an upgrade from the previous 720p FaceTime HD camera, the 12-megapixel Center Stage camera is a larger step. Beyond the enhanced video quality, the ability to move around while the Center Stage feature follows you reduces the exhausting need to stay stationary during prolonged video calls.

Double Display Support

I have relied on and evangelized multiple displays since the early 1990s because of the significant productivity boost provided by extra screen space. My 27-inch iMac sits side-by-side with a 27-inch Thunderbolt Display, and when I use my M1 MacBook Air, another 27-inch Thunderbolt Display serves as the primary screen above the MacBook Air’s built-in display. However, there was no way to drive two external displays until the M3 MacBook Air, and that came at the cost of having to close the lid to take the built-in screen out of the equation.

With the M4 MacBook Air, Apple has eliminated all the tradeoffs. It can drive two external displays at up to 6K resolution while keeping the main display active. This is helpful not only because it gives you another screen on which to stash windows but also because you can continue to use the built-in keyboard and trackpad rather than buying a Magic Keyboard with Touch ID for $149 and a Magic Trackpad for $129.

$100 Lower Price and a New Color

With the M2 MacBook Air, Apple raised the starting price from $999 to $1099 and kept it there for the M3 MacBook Air, partly because older models remained available at the $999 price point. With the M4 MacBook Air, Apple has made the buying decision simpler by eliminating the M2 and M3 models entirely and reducing the starting price of the M4 MacBook Air back to $999 for the 13-inch model and $1199 for the 15-inch model. Memory upgrades include 24 GB for $200 or 32 GB for $400, and storage options beyond the base 256 GB carry the usual price premiums: 512 GB for $200, 1 TB for $400, and 2 TB for $800.

Finally, the M4 MacBook Air now comes in a sky blue color that replaces space gray as an option—silver, starlight, and midnight remain available. It’s impossible to know what the sky blue color will look like, but if it’s anything like the blue titanium color Apple used for the iPhone 15 Pro, it will usually read as silver.

You can place pre-orders now, with availability starting 12 March 2025.

What About the 14-inch M4 MacBook Pro?

If you’re thinking about buying a 13-inch M4 MacBook Air and aren’t constrained to the most affordable option, also consider the 14-inch M4 MacBook Pro. It costs $500 more for a comparable 512 GB configuration, but it sports a larger, brighter screen, longer battery life, a third Thunderbolt 4 port, an HDMI port, an SDXC card slot, and superior speakers. It’s also slightly larger and 0.7 pounds (310 grams) heavier.

To my mind, Apple has done a good job of differentiating the two—you’ll pay more for the MacBook Pro and have to carry a heavier laptop, but you receive noticeable improvements in return. For most users, I would still recommend the M4 MacBook Air, but if the $500 premium isn’t a deal-breaker, the 14-inch M4 MacBook Pro is an exceptionally nice machine.

3 Likes

I’ll just add this for the budget conscious crowd. The real kicker here IMHO is that Apple is now offering an M2 MacBook Air with 16 GB RAM for just $709 in the Apple Refurb store.

3 Likes

I am surprised that the “base storage” is still only 256Gb. That is woeful for anyone working with photos or video. it defeats the concept of portability if the user must also carry around an external drive.

In addition to the cost of extra storage there are likely to be weeks of delay for delivery of the “custom” models with storage in excess of 256Gb (at least that is the case in Australia). I have noticed that non-Apple retail outlets don’t even offer “custom” models for many weeks after the release of the base models.

4 Likes

2.2 pounds =0.998 kilograms

Minor fix required for weight?

Oops! Biffed a power of ten while converting from kilograms—it’s 310 grams, not 31. Fixed.

1 Like

If you’re dealing with photos and videos to that extent, you should buy a model with more storage.

Yes - that’s my point. In Australia usually only the base model is available in the first few weeks of a model release.
Last time I bought a Mac I needed an M2 Macbook Air as an urgent replacement for a dead iMac. A 1Tb version would have been weeks away so I ended up with 500GB, which means my main Photos library has to be on an external drive. I have to remember to not open Photos when not connected to that drive.

The MBA normally is connected by USB-c cable to a 32" LG monitor that also supplies power and access to the external hard drive. So at least only have to connect one cable to the MBA to have the equivalent of the previous iMac.

I also use a “legacy” 27" iMac with 1Tb internal storage as a household media server (e.g. Homesharing) and backup system.

1 Like

Sorry, I’ll edit my previous comment: “If you’re dealing with photos and videos to that extent, you should buy a model with more storage, even if it means waiting a few weeks after the new model introduction.”

I would think most users would hit a wall with that amount at some point during the lifetime of the machine. Perhaps for schools or institutions with focussed use cases, it might be sufficient.

1 Like

My last MacBook was a 2012 MacBook Pro that lasted until about 2018. During that time I upgraded the RAM and swapped the hard drive out for an SSD. When the screen finally died, it was during the dark days of the butterfly keyboard. Instead, I switched to an iMac and use an iPad for my mobile needs. I like the iPad fine as far as it goes but, as everyone here knows, there are certain things it just can’t do.

Now I’m trying to figure out if I can justify getting a MacBook Air. With the release of the M4, the refurbished M3 has dropped in price. A 15-inch/16Gb/512Gb model is $1099 compared to $1399 for the M4. It would be nice to be able to work on programming projects (and all the other things the iPad can’t do) without being tethered to my desk at home again. But is it twelve hundred dollars (gotta add that tax) worth of nice? I fear I may be succumbing to temptation.

1 Like

The question of sufficient storage is an interesting one these days. If you take tons of photos or videos, you’ll need more than 256 GB of storage. I have about 47,000 photos and 800 videos in my Photos library, and it’s about 232 GB. Whether that should be internal or external storage is another question—as the data approaches a terabyte, external storage becomes necessary anyway.

But many people don’t do that, and little else will consume that kind of space, particularly for those who do much of their work in cloud apps.

Personally, I would be hesitant to recommend 256 GB for anyone who didn’t know for a fact they needed little internal storage, either due to very low data requirements or very high data requirements that would point to saving money on internal storage and spending it on external storage. But Tonya has been happy with 512 GB for many years now, and I’ve been fine with 1 TB for equally as long.

2 Likes

I’m not a fan of non-upgradeable machines for personal use, but I do think Apple did a good job with pricing on the M4 MBA (unlike the iPhone 16e). When I bought my personal 13" M1 MBA three years ago, I went with a maximum configuration of 16 GB RAM and 2 TB SSD. It looks like today’s 13" M4 with 24 GB RAM and 2 TB SSD can be had for the same price (appx USD $1900).

I would never recommend a 256 GB SSD machine for personal use in 2025, but I’ve come to accept that it has a legitimate place in many organizations. By limiting local storage, users are encouraged to store their files in the cloud (OneDrive, Dropbox, etc.), where the IT department can ensure that data is backed up more effectively. Of course, staff whose work truly requires more local storage can be accommodated easily.

2 Likes

Fully agree. Anyone serious about photography has way more photos than even Adam does…they build up fast at 55MB or so for a RAW shot. But even non photographers need space…and IMO if you have and use a laptop using external storage doesn’t make much sense. I do not do photo processing on my M1 Pro 14 MBP…but I do have Lightroom and Photoshop installed and have 90pGB used on my 2 TB internal drive. Photo processing gets done on a Studio with a RAID and a couple 9f 4TB Thunderbolt SSDs attached…but I need to ne able to do some processing on the road for eventual transfer to the desktop. Music, local DropBox files, email…it all takes space and I have a hard time suggesting less than a 1TB drive in a laptop because external eliminates a lot of the laptop advantage. If I were buying today then I would get 4TB since it’s non upgradeable.

2 Likes

Me too, but I would hasten to add I would not be were it not for the SDXC slot in my MBP. To me, there’s your expandable, on-board storage (that’s where my Photos library is). To be sure, slower by a lot, but works a treat for what I use it for.

2 Likes

I got myself an M3 MacBook Air at the end of last year via the Apple Certified Refurbished store, for less than the equivalently specced M2 version that was still on sale. :slightly_smiling_face: Looking at the pricing now for the M4 version, it’s at the same price point (£1399, for 24GB RAM and 512GB SSD) that the M2 version was offered at. Good news if you’re looking to save by getting a refurbished model, I expect, especially if you’re buying for a light workload. :slightly_smiling_face: I don’t regret my purchase at all, it’s working like a champ at everything I’ve thrown at it thus far! Very glad that I sprung for the extra RAM, though.

I so wish I thought a MacBook Air would be enough for me. I love my 14-inch M2 Max MacBook Pro, but it’s a little too big and a little too heavy. I was using my work MacBook Air for a couple of weeks while dealing with my MacBook Pro’s issues last month, and really felt the lack of SD card slot and the dearth of Thunderbolt ports.

1 Like

Jason Snell has reviewed it now, and his lead sentence sums it up nicely. I agree entirely.

The new M4 MacBook Air is the Mac most people should buy.

1 Like

With iCloud Photos enabled, with the “Optimize Mac Storage” option, doesn’t this essentially take care of itself? I understand that not everyone uses these features, but in my experience supporting customers who use Apple products, most of them are thrilled not to have to manage storage for photos and videos. They love that they can just have the Mac behave like their iPhone - i.e., showing them all their photos and videos, but only downloading the full resolution files when they actually open them.
I get it that not everyone wants to pay for iCloud storage, and that professionals have different needs, but it seems like the baseline configuration is perfect when paired with iCloud, for most non-professional use cases.

And I think I’d almost fall into that category! :slight_smile:

With the way these new Apple Silicon Macs handle themselves and what they offer, even on their base configs, I could definitely see myself getting an M4 13" MBA over the M4 Pro 14" MBP I have now.

I’d love the lighter and thinner package. I don’t need all the extra ports on the MBP since I always dock it when at the desk (never used an SD card all my life and on the go I can get HDMI through USB-C). And for now I’m pretty sure 32GB RAM and 2TB flash would also be alright.

What to me is the crucial difference is the quality of the screen and speakers. I’ve been spoiled rotten by the bright and awesome quality screen as well as the crisp and solid audio of the MBP. I like to work outdoors when I can so brightness to me matters a lot. I just cannot see myself ever going back to the MBA’s display after having been spoiled by the MBP.

1 Like

It’s certainly a big step in the right direction. My main hesitation with iCloud Photos and Optimize Mac Storage is that you can’t make a local backup of photos, which are precious to many people. I don’t expect Apple to lose them, but there’s still only one copy on iCloud that could be prone to user error or account breaching.

Interesting! I never work outdoors because it’s near impossible for me to find a comfortable place to sit or stand. Plus, the screen always seems to have some sort of glare on it. And while better audio is never a bad thing, I only really listen in my office, where I have good speakers.

I’d have a tough time deciding between an M4 MacBook Air and an M4 MacBook Pro. The question is if I could make an argument for needing an M4 Pro chip, but I’m having trouble doing that.