Sort of: I don’t see the point in the 
reaction, to me it means the same as 
. To be honest, I think the only additional reactions that have any use are 
and 
. They are both clear and useful reactions. Personally I would also find 
very useful, because to me it’s a more emphatic version of . But @ace tried it and then decided it wasn’t differentiated enough.
In that original discussion the issue of and being too similar was also raised (not just by me), and Adam was going to monitor the use of them. Given the many more important things he has to do I don’t know if he ever did any analysis on this, but as the reactions were working without issue (until now?) I suspect there was no need.