iOS 18’s Messages via Satellite Feature Is Magic

Originally published at: iOS 18’s Messages via Satellite Feature Is Magic - TidBITS

Let me be blunt: if you have an iPhone 14 or later and live in the US or Canada, upgrade to iOS 18 now to get Messages via satellite. (The third-generation iPhone SE 3, released in 2022, lacks satellite support.) The satellite connectivity provided by the last three generations of iPhones should be part of everyone’s disaster preparedness, just as people used to carry cell phones in their cars purely in case of emergency. Sure, cell connectivity is widespread, except when it’s not, and as those affected by Hurricane Helene can report, it’s far from guaranteed in natural disasters. Roughly 75% of cell sites in affected areas of North Carolina were offline initially, primarily due to power outages and transport failures, and nearly two weeks later, 12% remain offline.

Apple doesn’t yet charge for its satellite services. The company notes that “Roadside Assistance, Emergency SOS, and Messages via satellite are included for free for two years with the activation of any iPhone 14 or later model.” However, Apple already extended that time frame for an additional year for iPhone 14 owners (see “Apple Extends Free Emergency SOS via Satellite for iPhone 14 Users for Another Year,” 15 November 2023). We’ll see what happens in November 2025.

Messages via satellite currently works only in the US and Canada, Roadside Assistance is available only in the US and UK, and you can use Emergency SOS in a handful of European countries plus Australia, Canada, Japan, and New Zealand.

A Brief History of iPhone Satellite Communications

Two years ago, Apple introduced Emergency SOS via satellite with the iPhone 14 and iOS 16 (see “Testing Emergency SOS and Find My via Satellite,” 21 November 2022). Giving a consumer-level cell phone powers equivalent to an expensive, dedicated satellite phone with a pricey service plan was an impressive technological (and business) feat. The technology proved its effectiveness within the year (see “Emergency SOS via Satellite Saves Lives in Maui Fires,” 10 August 2023). Apple also added the non-emergency Find My via satellite, letting you update your coordinates (every 15 minutes) so they can be viewed by people with whom you had already shared your location. When iOS 17 came out, Apple expanded the service to help stranded motorists with Roadside Assistance via satellite (see “Five Unexpected Announcements from Apple’s Wonderlust Event,” 12 September 2023).

While it’s impossible to criticize a service that literally saves lives, Emergency SOS via satellite was just the start. I guessed wrong about what would come in iOS 17, but my conclusion to “Testing Emergency SOS and Find My via Satellite” was prescient with regard to iOS 18 allowing text messaging via satellite:

So Apple, how about this for a roadmap? … if the satellite system proves capable of handling the traffic, iOS 18 could also allow us to send short texts via satellite.

Apple has now done that, enabling anyone with an iPhone 14, iPhone 15, or iPhone 16 running iOS 18 to communicate using Messages even when there is no cellular or Wi-Fi connectivity. It’s easy to do, but since you may not be able to find dead zones as easily as I can, let me show you the process and share usage notes. I also recommend trying Apple’s Satellite Connection Demo by tapping the Satellite button in Control Center.

Satellite Connection Demo

Using Messages via Satellite

The iPhone’s satellite connectivity activates only when there is no cellular or Wi-Fi service; Airplane Mode isn’t sufficient. When you can use it, an SOS icon appears in the upper right corner of the screen, sometimes along with a satellite icon. I often find myself in SOS mode, but for this test, I biked 8 miles to a spot in the nearby town of Brooktondale that has no cell coverage. Imagine me standing next to my bike alongside a rural road on a fall day in upstate New York, holding my iPhone to the sky and rotating every few minutes.

SOS icon in the iPhone status bar

Unlike cellular and Wi-Fi, satellite connectivity isn’t automatic. Activating the service requires a trip to the Settings app, where a Satellite option appears under Battery if you’re in the right circumstances. Alternatively, your first launch of Messages after entering SOS mode prompts you to enable the service; tapping the notification opens Settings > Satellite.

Getting started with Messages via satellite

Apple offers a crisp explanation of satellite connectivity and how the connection process works. First, tap Use Messages via Satellite. Then, turn your iPhone to point at the satellite. Once you align your dot with the satellite image and see the green haze between the two, you’re connected. I’ll focus on Messages, but other buttons let you update your shared Find My location, start Roadside Assistance, or contact an emergency dispatcher using Emergency SOS. Although you can’t send your location using Messages via satellite, you can update Find My via satellite and message those who can see it to check where you are.

How to connect via satellite

When you switch back to Messages, iPhone models with a Dynamic Island show a green dot and checkmark to indicate you’re connected; if it turns orange, you’ve lost connectivity and need to realign with the satellite. (I’m not sure how this looks on the iPhone 14 or iPhone 14 Plus, the only models with satellite support that lack the Dynamic Island.)

Satellite connection in the Dynamic Island

More interesting is how Messages informs you what’s possible within a conversation. The text field shows gray text reading either “iMessage • Satellite” or “Text Message • Satellite”. Apple’s documentation suggests four scenarios:

  • iPhone users running iOS 18 or later can communicate via iMessage (top left, below).
  • Non-iPhone users can receive and send messages via SMS (top right, below).
  • iPhone users running iOS 17.6 or later can also receive and send via SMS (also top right, below).
  • iPhone users running iOS 17.5 or earlier can receive via SMS but may not be able to reply.

Messages you see when connected via satellite

Oddly, Tonya showed up as being allowed to use iMessage even though she’s still running iOS 17.6.1—I believe that’s because she upgraded one of her Macs to macOS 15 Sequoia. For those limited to SMS, Messages says, “Name may not be able to reply from devices where the software hasn’t been updated.” I received replies from all the people identified as such, so I’m unsure what Apple is warning about. If you don’t get a reply from someone who might be running an old version of iOS, that may be why.

The bottom two screenshots in the collection above show conversations that refused to allow satellite communications. The first is straightforward—group chats aren’t available via satellite, even if everyone is on iMessage. I get that—even if there isn’t a technical limitation, Apple presumably doesn’t want people overloading the system with chatty conversations.

The second is more obscure. Apple warns in its notes that iMessage won’t work for someone “if you haven’t sent them an iMessage recently,” but SMS should. That message appears in a conversation that hasn’t seen any traffic for six months. We should have been given the option to use SMS. On a subsequent test with TidBITS editor Glenn Fleishman, I was given the option to switch to SMS using his primary phone number. Oddly, the SMS messages I sent him disappeared from my iPhone once I had coverage again, even though they remained visible on Messages on both our Macs.

You may be able to force a switch to SMS in iOS 18 by going to Settings > Apps > Messages and making sure that Send as Text Message is available; you may also have to disable iMessage in the same spot. When I was back in cellular coverage, I could continue the conversation just fine, and it worked on a subsequent test. Add this to the weird prep list for going off the grid: send iMessages to infrequent conversation partners you may want to contact! (Glenn speculates that Apple’s satellites or ground stations cache a subset of the hundreds of millions of security elements it creates for secure iMessage conversations and purges them over time when not in use.)

The primary functional difference between iMessage and text message conversations via satellite is the character count limitation. Satellite-based iMessage limits you to 500 characters; text messages are restricted to 140 characters, a limit inherent in SMS. Those restrictions are hard and fast—exceeding the specified number disables the send button. (Messages normally sidesteps the character count issue with regular SMS and MMS by sending multiple messages.) iMessage conversations via satellite are also end-to-end encrypted; SMS conversations are not.

Regardless of your connection type, you cannot send pictures, videos, audio messages, stickers, location, or anything else under the + button to the left of the text field. Emoji work fine, as do tapbacks. Despite not having an Internet connection, I was pleasantly surprised to be able to dictate my messages instead of tapping them out one letter at a time, like an animal.

Of course, messages are sent slowly, with send times sometimes reaching as high as 30 to 60 seconds, depending on the iPhone’s satellite connection. As you can see below, a blue or green fill bar appears at the top of the conversation while the message is sending. You can switch to other conversations or apps while it’s being sent. If you lose the satellite link, Messages will keep trying until you reconnect.

Fill bar while sending via Messages via satellite

To receive replies, you must stay connected to the satellite. As long as that’s the case, conversations flow naturally. During testing, I exchanged messages with four people. Your iMessage correspondents are informed they’re communicating with you via satellite and must tap Send via Satellite for the first message, as my podcast friend Allison Sheridan did below.

What the receiver sees with messages sent via satellite

My tests weren’t entirely successful, with my satellite messages to Tonya never arriving, although my iPhone shows them being sent via iMessage. We eventually discovered that they did arrive, but only on a little-used Mac that she had upgraded to Sequoia. I suspect that when she installs iOS 18 on her iPhone, satellite messages will appear there, too.

Apple doesn’t let arbitrary people, contacts or otherwise, message you before you connect to the satellite unless you’ve added them as an emergency contact or they are a member of your Family Sharing group. People in those two categories can message you via SMS while you’re offline, and their texts are delivered as soon as you connect to the satellite. (You can prepare for being otherwise unreachable by adding the current people you most need to remain in touch with to your emergency contacts.)

Messages shows these contacts a message when you’re off the grid and potentially reachable via satellite. Since they’ll likely be iMessage users, it’s unclear whether they need to disable iMessage (as explained above) to send you an SMS instead of an iMessage or if their iPhone will prompt them to resend as a text message when the iMessage isn’t delivered. Apple explains, “You won’t receive iMessages until your emergency contact or family member returns to the conversation and taps Send via Satellite underneath their message bubble.” My takeaway is that you shouldn’t assume any incoming messages will work until you’ve triggered your end of the conversation.

Maintaining your satellite connection may require no intervention for several minutes, but satellites move quickly, so you must rotate periodically to keep one in view. Also, satellites regularly fall below the horizon in any direction, so you may need to turn around to connect to a new one. The system is smart enough to tell you when the next satellite will be in range, with a countdown in minutes. Since I was just testing the system and wasn’t in distress, I found following the satellites around kind of fun.

Dynamic Island feedback while finding satellites

When you’re done, just put your iPhone away to break the connection.

Although it comes with some weird caveats and footnotes, Messages via satellite worked sufficiently well in my testing that I have no qualms recommending it. I don’t expect to need it regularly, but I spend enough time in areas with weak cell service—largely on the trails and rural roads around Ithaca—to use it every month or two. I don’t want to oversell it as a life-saving feature—Emergency SOS via satellite ticked that box two years ago. Yet Messages via satellite will still make life easier and less stressful for millions of people. I’ll be able to communicate more readily while volunteering at trail races, and I can bike long distances knowing I can easily text for help if I blow a tire. Plus, while upstate New York isn’t usually plagued by hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, and other natural disasters that can disrupt the cell network, it could prove helpful during extreme weather events.

Ultimately, it’s not just about staying connected; it’s about being prepared for whatever life might throw your way. Messages via satellite provides essential connectivity that lets you reach out for help or comfort wherever you find yourself, whether you’re hiking in remote areas, traveling through cellular dead zones, or facing a natural disaster that has knocked out local infrastructure. If you’re still on the fence about upgrading to iOS 18, consider this a nudge.

 

2 Likes

But there are not infrequent snow storms/thunderstorms that knock out power in rural areas which certainly disrupts the cell network, even if you have your own power backup system at your home.

Does cloud cover affect satellite acquisition? Could you use it standing outside in a snow storm?

I haven’t seen that as an issue in the 23 years since we moved back here from Seattle, so I did a little research. In 2015, the FCC mandated that all cell towers offer 8 hours of backup power, with that increasing to 24 hours in 2019. And some towers have their own natural gas supplies to power generators without needing to be resupplied. Obviously, a sufficiently extreme weather event will still disrupt the cell network, as we saw with Hurricane Helene, but a snowstorm or thunderstorm doesn’t seem likely to do it.

We won’t know until it snows! :snowflake: But I did test again today, when it was overcast and drizzling slightly, and it worked fine. It even worked fine from within the car.

1 Like

Is this all cell sites or only those that are owned by mobile network operators?

Telcos have a long history of providing robust backup power to their central offices and radio transceiver sites.

But these days, a lot of cell sites are not full “towers”, but are small cell sites mounted on buildings, leasing the space from the building owners and using local Internet access for backhaul to the central office. Do you know if these backup power laws apply to these sites as well?

Many years ago (maybe it was before 2015), I found that the cell network went off-line during major power outages because most of the sites in my town were on the roofs of local buildings and were (I assume) powered solely from those buildings’ power. Fortunately, I had a land-line (FiOS-based) at the time, and my ONT had a backup battery, so that worked.

Ironically, fiber-based land lines like FiOS are no longer required to include backup power. Service providers today charge extra for it, if they offer it at all. (Of course, you can still plug it in to a regular UPS, but in the past, you didn’t have to do this in order to keep your voice service during an outage.)

1 Like

Can’t wait to see if folks can get this to work on aircraft.

I’m not a fan of becoming even more reachable, if anything I’d like fewer connections and more communications detox. But the tech behind this and how nicely Apple has implemented it hiding all the complexity is just really cool.

I’m far from expert in this field, but I believe this is the relevant regulation:

A Perplexity search suggests that the cell sites might still be only 8 hours, but there are a lot of terms of art here that I don’t fully understand.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/as-of-2019-what-are-the-fcc-re-OQSNBryAQLCNIp0Iw4NtQw

Allison Sheridan tried it from a plane and wasn’t able to make a connection. Perhaps she can explain what she did—she only shared the unsuccessful screenshots with me.

Given the speed with which the satellites move when you’re on the ground, I’m not surprised that it would be difficult or impossible to make or maintain a connection at 500 mph. I presume that the satellite connections the airplanes use are different… yes, it’s the difference between geostationary satellites for in-flight Wi-Fi and low-earth orbit satellites for Apple. Perplexity has a nice summary

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/what-are-the-differences-in-te-a45kdVebQLmLfzOA3xCv6A

And this referenced article in the Perplexity results speculates that it won’t work and quotes an expert, though it doesn’t really say why.

https://simpleflying.com/wwdc24-apple-messages-wont-send-free-in-flight-sms-via-satellite/

I don’t think the speed of the plane is the problem, or what kind of satellites we want to talk through.

When I tried to use Messages, it never even got to the point where it told me to wave my phone around looking for the signal.

The issue is most likely the metal tube I was sitting in. The power of the transmitter on the phone is so low, that metal would most certainly block enough of the power that it couldn’t ever make contact with the satellite.

This is also true of the receiver on the phone, but the phone has to make contact first through its transmit radio.

1 Like

I originally upgraded to my iPhone 15 only because of the satellite feature. We live in Sedona, AZ and we regularly hike on nearby trail systems with no wireless coverage. We also drive to nearby areas without wireless along the roads, so for me the satellite feature is a big deal. Once, before the satellites, one of our hiking buddies had injured their ankle and was unable to walk at first. We were unable to call for assistance without hiking a couple of miles, and then up a hill. Even after doing that we never got a reliable signal, but fortunately in that case, the injured hiker was able to eventually proceed. Even though I haven’t yet needed to use it, it’s an important component for high desert hiking, as well as driving on risky rugged roads.

1 Like

There’s a similar issue with GPS. It’s hard to get a good GPS signal on an aircraft doing 600 mph at 40,000 ft. And yet it sometimes works. A plane is a metal tube alright, but it has lots of windows and they’re far too large to present an efficient cut-off a the typical GHz frequencies (L band or ~1.5 GHz is ~20 cm). I bet we’ll soon hear from somebody who got it to work even if it’s a bit finicky.

The 47 CFR § 9.20 requirements seem to apply only to cellular services that are sold as replacements for landlines. Verizon offers one, called “Wireless Home Phone,” but AT&T apparently stopped offering its equivalent service in 2017. (I wonder if the backup power requirement was a factor in AT&T’s decision.)

It wouldn’t seem to cover regular cell phone plans, or home cellular Internet plans, even though they mostly use the same infrastructure. All the carriers offer home Internet plans.

I know that in cities, a lot of street-level in-fill coverage is provided by small cells mounted on light poles. Those don’t have any room for backup batteries or generators.

Consumer Cellular (which uses the ATT network) has a product called Home Phone Base which is $15.00 a month and has battery backup but you do have to purchase the device:

https://www.consumercellular.com/shopping/details/verve_home_phone_base/details

My experience with the Garmin inReach device (that uses the Iridium satellite network) is that it is usually able to connect when outside under any weather conditions. Connection is less reliable when indoors, especially when initially connecting.

One advantage of the inReach system is that the associated iPhone app, in my case Earthmate, has a detailed topographic map doesn’t need to be online to work.

Also the app is much more user friendly for sending and receiving text messages than the cumbersome method with buttons on the inReach.

For someone sitting in a window seat getting a good GPS signal is easy if the phone is less than a window diameter away from the window. From my distant memory of E&M (Jackson’s book) the signal is exponentially attenuated when the aperture (window) diameter is on the order of or less than the wavelength. I don’t see the relevance of the airplane speed or altitude. Since one doesn’t have the assistance that one has on the ground, acquiring the satellites can take several minutes.

I used to do this all the time on flights using my (expensive) aviation app (ForeFlight). It gives things like the speed, altitude and position using a number of aviation charts. It helps kill the time. It is actually fun during approach to landing where the “synthetic vision” feature gives a real time perspective view of the runway and some nearby topographical features. Usually pretty accurately.

2 Likes

I like using the rather old and very simple Locatometer when flying. Especially for its display of altitude information, and heading and V/S information.

GPS depends very much on where you are. For one, one the ground we have cell tower triangulation that gives the iPhone a rough idea where it is which in turn allows the iPhone to already estimate where the relevant GPS satellites are, how many there are, etc. If your iPhone is off during TO and you then only turn it on later at FL400 it will usually take significantly longer for it to get an initial fix due to that missing information alone. There’s also the latitude. Polar routes are far more tricky because GPS has been optimized for where people live. So while it’s true that I usually have no trouble getting good GPS reception MIA-IAD, in the middle of a SEA-HEL flight, that is far more tricky even if the phone is right up against the window. And very equatorial routes are not always better either (for similar reason). Recently doing SFO-NAN, I was quite alright from SFO to about Hawaii, but after Hawaii I had trouble getting good fixes all the way to Fiji.

But that has to do with GPS specifically and the satellites it uses. Those are in an entirely different orbit (nominally 24 in about 20K km altitude) from those used for Apple’s iMessage over sat feature (LEO, somewhere around 1400 km altitude). So just because one works well or in a certain way, does not mean it’s the same for the other. Case in point, GPS reception doesn’t require a line of sight to be maintained the same way the iPhone will tell you to follow the satellite for iMessage transfer.

1 Like

As I noted, I’m far from expert in this field, so you very well may be right about those requirements not applying to cell sites. What’s frustrating is that I can find many people talking about the topic without ever directly specifying what, if anything, is required. For instance, I’ve looked at all of the references in this Perplexity search, and none are really definitive, though one article about what’s required in California claims there are no federal regulations.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/is-there-a-requirement-cellula-82pRrxZcQfqrVGvsXUY5kg

Part of the problem is that most of the search hits seem to be from providers of backup power solutions or law firms aimed at helping clients prepare for possible legislative outcomes.

1 Like

Great article Adam, thanks :+1:t2:

You don’t seem to mention coverage as far as I can tell :thinking:. As far as i know it’s not world-wide yet. I’ve seen 2 satellite coverage maps which are different, so it’s a bit confusing.

Also … how are Apple rolling this out country by country? On launch they said the US and Canada can send iMessages via satellite right now, but I don’t have a timeline for anywhere else. I’ve contacted Apple directly and they can’t tell me when it will work here in the UK, which is a bit odd.

For me, I do a lot of expedition activites where cell coverage is just not there. So I am quite interested. We use Garmin GPS devices (not inreach) and carry a PLB for emergency use. Satellite coms could fill in a useful gap for us.

Any info you have on roll-out would be appreciated.

Hope you are not turning your attention inward to be US centric only :wink:.

Thanks,

Keith

All things radio are government regulated. This includes satellite communication.

I’m sure Apple would love this feature to be deployed globally, but I’m sure that every country has its own relevant laws and each will require its own certification from whatever bureaucracy is equivalent to the US’s FCC.

Since it would take a long time to get certification from every country where iPhones are sold, Apple instead gets certification in order to quickly release the feature in the regions with the largest market share (I assume this would be the US, followed by the EU and then China), and then roll it out elsewhere as they can secure certification.

Just to say, it won’t be offered in China - Apple says, “Satellite connectivity isn’t offered on iPhone models purchased in Armenia, Belarus, China mainland, Hong Kong, Macao, Kazakhstan, and Russia.”

Yep, from the article: “Messages via satellite currently works only in the US and Canada, Roadside Assistance is available only in the US and UK, and you can use Emergency SOS 1 in a handful of European countries plus Australia, Canada, Japan, and New Zealand.”

As far as how Apple is rolling satellite stuff out in other countries, @Shamino has it right. It’s super complicated due to local regulations, and I’m sure Apple wants everything to be as widely available as possible. It just takes time to work through. (And I have to assume that Apple is one of the few companies that could work through such obstacles at all.)