Google Sunsets URL Shortener

(Adam Engst) #1

Originally published at:

Google has announced that no new users will be able to use the URL shortening service after 13 April 2018, and existing users will lose access on 30 March 2019. Shortened links will redirect indefinitely.

(@lbutlr) #2

Wow. That is… well, that sucks. This was the only shortener I was willing to use.

(Dan Daranciang) #3

Adam raises an interesting point about the Google Maps integration. I wonder what will replace it?

There’ll never be anything as pronounceable again.

(Adam Engst) #4

I think Google had removed the Google Maps integration some time ago. I used to maintain a single Google Map with locations for all of Tristan’s high school cross-country meets (which are often in places that don’t have easy addresses). At some point while he was still in high school, I stopped being able to link to those locations easily. I can’t remember the details, but might have been removed at that point.

(Monty VanderBilt) #5

Yet another example of why not to put personal data into any of Google’s peripheral products. The ones that have burned me worst were Panoramio and Picasa. I’ve also lost track of how many iterations Google’s web based photo products have gone through and I still can’t figure out how to organize photos there or share album browsing with friends without sending explicit share links. I live in fear of Google Earth being completely deprecated – it already seems to be on the wane. Gmail is probably safe, at least I hope so.

(Adam Engst) #6

Yes, I agree that Gmail is safe, since it’s used by far too many people.

But I think this may be more a sign of the times than a problem with Google. It’s not as though Apple is any better about orphaning products, unfortunately.

It’s one thing when it’s a product from an individual or small company and the business model just doesn’t work. But it’s frustrating when the product or service comes from a juggernaut and probably has more than enough users to satisfy any smaller firm.

(Gordon Meyer) #7

I read the other day that offers URL shortening. That seems promising because they actually paid accounts.

(Adam Engst) #8

Indeed — Zapier just broke that tool out on its own, probably in response to Google’s move.

(Jolin Warren) #9

Out of interest, why was the Google one ok and others aren’t? I personally don’t use URL shorteners at all, but also didn’t realise there was a difference between them. Isn’t Bitly the most popular?

(GraphicMac) #10

I don’t understand why some people are so surprised by this. Google has a long history of killing projects with little-to-no notice—and it doesn’t matter how big or popular it is (Google Reader, anyone?).

While is by far the most popular, it’s no better than Google or anyone else… they can sell or disappear at any moment, so the only permanent solution is to set up your own URL-shortener (which I’m told is not horribly difficult, but beyond the average user).

(@lbutlr) #11

The trick is protecting it while still having it be useful.

I have a friend who set one up. He had to pull the plug on it after a month or two because there were thousands or instances where people were using it to link to highly illegal forms of pornographic images.

It’s not hard, there are several that are nearly plug-and-play projects on GitHub. If you can setup a web server, you can setup a shortener.

(Adam Engst) #12

Turns out Google Forms still uses the link shortener. I wonder what Google will do to replace it?


(Seth Anderson) #13

My WordPress blog still uses FeedBurner (wikipedia entry) (bought by Google years ago, and then deprecated for years, but still works). So maybe the shortener will work for another decade…