Apple Discontinues the Mac Pro for Good

Originally published at: Apple Discontinues the Mac Pro for Good - TidBITS

After nearly 20 years, Apple has officially discontinued the Mac Pro, with no plans for future models, as first reported by Chance Miller at 9to5Mac. The move marks the end of an era for Apple’s most expandable desktop, although the Mac Pro had become something of an anachronism.

Early in its run, the Mac Pro was the choice of people like me who considered themselves professionals because they needed a bit more processing power, additional RAM to avoid swapping, faster (and less cluttered) internal storage, and support for multiple displays. I bought an early 2009 “cheese grater” Mac Pro for those reasons, paying $2279.

My current use for a Mac ProMy Mac Pro now serves as an end table alongside the original Power Mac G5 it replaced. Can you guess which is which?

In 2013, Apple introduced the cylindrical “trash can” Mac Pro at $2999, abandoning the cheese grater’s PCIe expandability for a compact design that relied on Thunderbolt 2 (see “Can a Normal User Justify a Mac Pro?,” 21 April 2014). The following year, the 27-inch iMac with Retina display arrived—combining significant CPU power with an unbeatable screen, user-expandable RAM, and dual-display support—capturing many users who had previously bought Mac Pros (see “Apple Launches iMac with Retina Display, Refreshes Mac mini,” 16 October 2014 and “The Retina iMac: It’s All about the Screen,” 31 October 2014). The 27-inch iMac’s popularity left the Mac Pro’s audience limited to scientists and audio/video professionals who specifically needed PCIe cards, which the cylindrical Mac Pro couldn’t provide.

Apple acknowledged its design mistake in 2017 (see “Maca Culpa: Apple Admits Mac Pro Missteps and Promises More Transparency,” 4 April 2017), but took two more years to release the third-generation Mac Pro, which hearkened back to the cheese grater design, albeit with feet and optional wheels. That model was still Intel-based, but saw a massive price jump to $5999 (see “2019 Mac Pro and Pro Display XDR: Big Iron for Big Bucks,” 10 December 2019). In 2023, Apple finally brought the Mac Pro into the Apple silicon era with the M2 Ultra chip, boosting the price again to $6999. Yet even as Apple advanced through M3, M4, and now M5 generations, the Mac Pro remained stuck at the M2 Ultra.

With Apple silicon consolidating CPU, GPU, and memory onto a single chip, the traditional appeal of the Mac Pro to even its core audience of audio and video professionals—expanding RAM, adding PCIe cards, swapping out processors—largely vanished.

For the vast majority of users who need more power and connectivity than is provided by the Mac mini or MacBook Pro, the Mac Studio now offers equal or better performance than the Mac Pro at a significantly lower starting price ($1999) and in a smaller footprint (see “New Mac Studio and Studio Display Change Mac Buying Calculus,” 8 March 2022). That performance gap can only widen if the Mac Studio gains an M5 Ultra in its next refresh. The primary advantage the Mac Pro had over the Mac Studio was always its PCIe slot expandability, and Thunderbolt 5 now handles many tasks previously managed by PCIe.

For those who truly need supercomputer-level power—primarily for AI research—emerging support for RDMA over Thunderbolt 5 may allow multiple Mac Studios to be linked together.

As someone who moved away from the Mac Pro as Apple increased the distance between it and the consumer lineup, I have thoughts about what it means to serve a professional audience. After a 2014 and 2020 27-inch iMac with Retina display, I switched to a 14-inch MacBook Pro with a pair of Studio Displays (see “Switching from a 27-inch iMac to a 14-inch MacBook Pro: A Fresh Start,” 30 June 2025). It’s a good system, even a great system, but I stand by the points I made in “Apple: Design Macs for Other Types of Professionals” (5 March 2022) about how Apple still isn’t designing Macs for professionals in some ways. Yes, we now have the Studio Display, and Mac webcams are no longer criminally poor, but all Apple has done to improve screen ergonomics is give the Studio Display a $400 stand to add height adjustment—a few books work just as well. Keyboard and trackpad ergonomics haven’t improved, the edges of Mac laptops are still uncomfortably sharp, and there’s still no option for cellular connectivity in Mac laptops.

2 Likes

The MacPro is on the right and the G5 is on the left. This is based on the front ports.

I have owned both and still have the MacPro.

3 Likes

Love the photo! :grinning_face:

For me it was the drive bays - I remember installing a second optical drive in my Mac Pro.

2 Likes

I had a Dual 1Ghz Quicksilver G4 Mac then G5 Mac Pros and ended with the 2019 Mac Pro before switching to the Studio. I did go with the iMac Pro for a period but preferred the flexibility of a separate display.

The last Intel Mac Pro left a sour taste when Apple announced the switch to Apple Silicon just a few months later, given that it was much more expensive than previous Pro machines.

2 Likes

I have fond memories of the Power Mac G5 that I used for work in the 2000s. I had to replace the DVD writer drive at one point, as the original was heavily used and finally decided it had had enough, so I got to see the interior design as well. :slightly_smiling_face:

I think you’ve put your finger on the reason for the Mac Pro’s decline: the 27-inch iMac was good enough for a lot of folks (myself included) who didn’t need the extra expandability and lacked the budget for the Pro. The writing was on the wall from then onwards. :slightly_frowning_face:

1 Like

I’ve upgraded a many G5 and MacPros over the years. The large heatsink ram modules, the PITA angle SATA connectors and trays. The ramping up of fans. The pain to replace the powersupply or the procedure on replacing processors. And the knuckle-scraping of the “cheese grater” case. And those MacPros were not lightweights. I was impressed at the quiet design of the “wine cooler” 2013 Mac Pro and did a powersupply replacement which pretty much was a complete teardown.
Never had the chance to see the last revision (2019) in person. With a gasp at the price and the jokes about the “addon” US$700 wheel cost, it wasn’t for me. Once Apple killed off the Xserve lines, I was forlorn to predict the same for the Mac Pro line if it touched the $10K price (it went over that with options). And how the iMac Pro was discontinued after only 3-4 years. Three to Four Years… must be a curse… 2023 Macpro RIP.
FWIW, I supported several design firms and designers over the years. Many are now retired, and the few that remain are just doing hobby or craft work for small side work; or wonderfully have their grownup children supporting them. Desktop publishing and graphics designer are no longer in demand as they once were- and with AI, you just type in what you need, and viola, you have a company logo or design.

Tip on RDMA: you need to boot into Recovery mode and enable via rdma_ctl enable command in Terminal. And RDMA is only available Thunderbolt 5-capable macs like the M3 Ultra Studio models or later. And limited to 4. But I’m not going down that path either…would be nice to run a local LLM on mac silicon though.

1 Like

Everything you ever needed to know about the MacPro:

"The Definitive Classic Mac Pro (2006-2012) Upgrade Guide"

2 Likes

I solved my pro audio need for a PCI card in 2015 by building a Hackintosh based on a Skylake processor and selling my Mac Pro. My Hack has served me well for years, still running it for pro audio work. But music notation, graphics, and all else now on an Apple Silicon box.

1 Like

My Mac Pro is still in use for editing RAW photos in Lightroom Classic.
Mac Pro 5,1 with hardware upgraded:
2x Intel® Xeon® Processor X5675 12M Cache, 3.06 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI x2
48 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 ECC SDRAM
ASUS Radeon RX 580 8GB
High Point SSD7101A-1 PCIe 3.0 x16 4-Port M.2 NVMe RAID AIC
2x SSD 970 PRO NVMe M.2 1TB