Wonky Mojave behaviors

(Will M) #1

When I say wonky Mojave, of course I mean that its behavior surprises me and not in a good way. If any of these complaints have a silver lining or a workaround that I’m missing, please say so. Also, unless otherwise noted, all these behaviors occur while the MacBook is connected to an external display and the MacBook lid is closed.

Since installing Mojave, Time Machine seems to take longer to prepare backups and to perform backups. Time Machine usually took a minute to finish copying after it said 10 seconds remaining, but under El Capitan, after the actual copying of files began, the time remaining rarely increased. Perhaps Mojave is simply being more accurate with its estimate; in a typical example, Mojave just started with an estimate of 8 minutes and it climbed to 14 minutes as files were being copied. This is using a USB disk as the storage unit, but similar things happen when using an Apple Time Capsule over ethernet. (Why would I care, since Time Machine should work in the background? Because I have an external drive that is usually not mounted. I mount it as needed, and usually perform a Time Machine backup while it’s mounted, and dismount it afterwards. Under Mojave, it takes longer for Time Machine to do its thing.)

When the screen saver kicks in, pressing a key will not restore the desktop. Under El Capitan, I would press a modifier key (usually command) and the desktop would come right back. Under Mojave, nothing happens. If I press the space bar, the screen flickers and a beep sounds, but the screen saver stays engaged. I need to press a mouse button to get the desktop back. It’s not a big deal, but it’s a change in the way the Macintosh reacts to the user. It seems like pressing a key should interrupt the screen saver. If the MacBook has gone fully asleep, then pressing a modifier key does wake it, although there is a significantly longer delay than under El Capitan.

I use tabs in a Finder window. Under El Capitan, I could close the Finder window, and when I clicked on the Finder icon in the Dock (if no other Finder window was open), I would get a Finder window with my tabs. Under Mojave, the Finder forgets the tabs, and I need to re-open them each time. (My workaround for this is to leave the Finder window open and hide the Finder when I would have closed the window. I think this would work fine if I were trainable.)

If I use Firefox on the internal screen (which I do if I’m away from my study, which is essentially daily), when I return to my office and use the external display, Firefox windows are sized for the internal display and located at the bottom left of the external display. Under El Capitan, on return to my office, Firefox windows usually took the size they had been when they were last open on the external display. (Not always; in case it’s significant, the windows would be at the top left of the screen when they did not resume their previous size and location.) I have an Excel worksheet that is usually sized for the internal screen, open, and hidden; today, after viewing the worksheet on the internal screen, it had migrated to the bottom left of the external display. It appears that Mojave lost the capability to remember window position and size if the window appeared on the internal screen.

I have an encrypted volume (on removable media, in case it matters). After I double-click the sparse bundle’s icon, I need to enter a password. Under Mojave, I need to click in the window with the password field to make it active; under El Capitan, I could just start typing. Also, under Mojave, it takes much longer (at a guess, 20 seconds instead of 3 seconds) to mount volumes. Also, when I dismount a volume on an external drive with a rotating platter, the platter keeps rotating. Under El Capitan, the platter would stop.

In my opinion, all these situations represent a step in the wrong direction. Is there some advantage that I’m not noticing? Is there a way to get the El Capitan behavior while using Mojave? Thanks for insight, or at least sympathy. And finally, is putting all this in one post appropriate, or should I have addressed each issue in a separate thread?

0 Likes

(Simon) #2

I’m afraid I’ve experienced similar issues when upgrading since probably around 10.6. Often stuff got added I was never really keen on in the first place but then they screwed with stuff I actually used and either made it either worse/unreliable, removed it entirely, or broke stuff. I submitted pages of bug reports or feedback, but never got an answer and after all these years I don’t believe a single reported item has ever been changed. Bottom line, since SL I rarely found OS X updates a pleasure.

OTOH you don’t really have a choice these days because once you’re more than one or two versions behind you’re not getting security updates and a lot of apps won’t install or run. In fairness, it’s worse on iOS where you can’t even downgrade and you’re constantly nagged to update all so Apple can pad their marketing stats.

Anyway, in a world where we don’t update because we’re super excited by new features but rather because we’re essentially forced to update, I’m not surprised there’s little incentive to make updates actually worthwhile. Sure, maybe they all are to some. I just don’t happen to know that demographic. All I know is that it’s not mine or that of the people I work with.

0 Likes

(Doug Miller) #3

FWIW, I am not seeing this on Mojave. When I open an encrypted sparse bundle, I’m presented with the password field with the cursor ready to type.

As for the rest, I’m not sure I use just the internal display, I don’t use Time Machine, and it’s rare when I close my Finder window (it’s usually a mistaken press of Cmd-W) and I can’t recall what happens when I open a new window after closing the last one.

0 Likes

(Will M) #4

That’s what motivated the update.

I don’t know if that’s good or bad. Good that it behaves properly for you, but bad that the behavior is inconsistent. Thanks for the data point.

0 Likes