Dia AI Browser Introduces $20 Monthly Pro Plan with Unlimited Chat

Originally published at: Dia AI Browser Introduces $20 Monthly Pro Plan with Unlimited Chat - TidBITS

Despite refining its Arc Web browser into a must-have for many professionals, The Browser Company never charged for it or even floated a business model. The firm has changed gears with its follow-up browser, Dia. Even though Dia isn’t broadly available and is still in early development (currently version 0.41), it’s now possible to subscribe to Dia Pro for $20 per month with a 14-day free trial. You can download Dia from that page even if you’re not an Arc user or on the waitlist; I don’t know if it will let you set up a new account.

Dia Pro offer

The only difference between Dia and Dia Pro is “Chat as much as you want, without hitting limits.” The Browser Company doesn’t specify what those limits are, although presumably you’ll be informed (and provided with an upsell) once you exceed them. Last month, The Browser Company CEO Josh Miller told the New York Times that it would offer multiple plans ranging from $5 to hundreds of dollars per month, depending on usage, but a free version would remain available for those who use it only a few times a week.

This new subscription model was likely triggered by Dia’s chatbot racking up significant bills from the AI providers it taps for responses to user questions. According to the New York Times article, Dia leverages ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, among others, analyzing user prompts and routing each one to whichever AI model is most likely to give the best response.

The problem Dia faces is that it’s far from alone in adding a context-aware chatbot to a Web browser. Microsoft Edge—maybe not your first choice for a Mac browser—offers Copilot in a sidebar and can work with the contents of open tabs. Brave users can turn on the Leo AI sidebar. Subscribers to Google’s AI Pro plan ($19 per month) can access Gemini within Chrome. Perplexity has made early versions of its Comet browser available to Perplexity Max ($200 per month) subscribers and some people from its waitlist (I just got it today). Reuters reports that OpenAI is close to releasing its own browser as well.

I still haven’t found the time or brain space to undertake a comprehensive comparison of Brave, Comet, Dia, and Edge, the AI-powered browsers I can use easily. I continue to dabble with Dia, and while I find it interesting to have chatbot conversations around the pages I’m reading, I always go back to Arc for the numerous pinned tabs that give me single-click access to my online life (see “Do You Use It? Revisiting Websites with Windows, Bookmarks, Tabs, and Pinned Tabs,” 11 July 2025).

Frankly, I don’t have high hopes for Dia. As I noted in “Dia Browser Debuts with Contextual AI Chat, But Arc Users Feel Left Behind” (20 June 2025), part of the rationale behind ditching Arc for Dia was that The Browser Company wanted to build a product that could be used by hundreds of millions of people. That may be necessary to satisfy the venture capitalists providing the funding—$128 million so far, according to TechCrunch—but it’s hard to see how the Dia we have today could somehow become enough better than both Chrome and Edge to attract that many users. Arc may have been too much for everyday users, but it could have had a chance at a sustainable business model as a high-powered productivity tool for power users. I’d pay $20 per month in a heartbeat for a version of Arc with Dia’s AI sidebar. Dia itself isn’t nearly compelling enough for that.

I jumped to Arc on your recommendation last year and LOVE it. I, too, would pay for a version of Arch with Dia’s AI sidebar. Right now, I am using both, with Arc being my primary browser. Just so much I love about Arc that eases the pain of a frenetic work day. I love the simplicity of Dia, especially now that they have integrated the side by side pains to help me with all my accounting spreadsheets.
But it does not look like the direction The Browser Company is taking. A little disappointing.

While I wasn’t on the Arc train I recently discovered the Vivaldi browser and I love it.

I can separate different personas for something like banking, internal IT, work and private stuff. It’s well organized and gives me a lot of flexibility while not overwhelming.

1 Like

The Zen browser takes a very similar design approach to Arc, although without the AI sidebar of Dia. Mind you, if you use Kagi search then you’d have the best of both worlds with its ability to hook into AI models.

2 Likes

Yup. I’m thinking that TBC is keeping Arc on idle mode just in case they reach the same conclusion. The “too complicated” argument, in my mind, could be expressed on a deeper level as tech nerds trying to get their families and friends to use Arc by urging them to use its deepest features (for which they have no use).

On a basic level, Arc is only as complicated as people make it. My Arc implementation is probably stretching things because of the number of spaces I have created.

But no one (maybe including me) needs that many spaces, I’m guessing. “Home”, “Work”, and maybe “Hobbies” would do it for most folks.

Dia may end up being DOA if they can’t find a niche for it. Arc may yet be the place where Dia’s concepts are implemented.

1 Like