Replacing an iMac Fusion drive vs getting iMac

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
21 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Replacing an iMac Fusion drive vs getting iMac

Rodney

On Dec 9, 2017, at 15:31, Curtis Wilcox <[hidden email]> wrote:

Yes. While how Fusion works is interesting, it adds risk of data loss that I avoid. And using it with external drives would be kind of crazy as they add additional risks.

Yep. I also agree that as SSD prices fall Fusion will become less relevant.

When I bought my iMac at the end of 2014 I paid extra for a 500GB SSD, and I bought a Drobo for bulk storage. All my apps, mail, whatever, fits nicely on the SSD, and I have my iTunes library, my Photos library, Plex library, etc, on the Drobo. The system is fast for the things I need it to be fast for, and the Drobo is plenty fast enough for iTunes and Plex. YMMV.

There were people who only got a 128GB SSD, then had to resort to symlinks and other hacks to get the bulk of their data stored somewhere else. I thought that this was “penny wise/pound foolish”.




____________TidBITS Talk Participation Guidelines____________
Post only when you have something substantive to contribute.
Be polite and constructive, and comment on posts, not people.
Quote sparingly, if at all. We all read the previous message.
Start threads with a new message to [hidden email].
Read archives at: http://tidbits.com/pipermail/tidbits-talk/
Unsubscribe at: http://tidbits.com/mailman/options/tidbits-talk
____Mailing List Manners: http://tidbits.com/series/1141 ____
12